top of page


On 25th April 2016 at 2.00 pm UK TIME a Court Case before God is taking place - sse it LIVE at


Bringing to Justice The EU Quislings

The Case For The Prosecution ………


1)  Contravention of the 1534 Act of Supremacy restored in the Elizabethan Settlement of 1559












The obligations of this act are as follows:


i) Increase in virtue (anointing) of Christ’s Religion. This means being bound to Christ, the present turning away from the real Christ Jesus of the Reformation being completely and absolutely unconstitutional. We therefore put to God that under the present Monarch placed under the restrictions of the unconstitutional EU that there has been no increase in virtue and that because of rebellion to this there has to be the choice between judgment and all that costs and repentance that comes with the blessings of Abraham.


Galatians 3 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)


3 O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? 

2 This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? 

3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? 

4 Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain. 

5 He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?

6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. 

7 Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. 

8 And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. 

9 So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. 

10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. 

11 But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith. 

12 And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them.

13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree: 

14 that the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.

15 Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man’s covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto.

16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. 

17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. 

18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave itto Abraham by promise.

19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator. 

20 Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.

21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. 

22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.

23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. 

24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.

25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.

26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. 

27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.

28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 

29 And if ye beChrist’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

ii) Repress and extirpate all errors, heresies, and other enormities and abuses. That Government has failed to address significant social changes in the nation that have come as a result of bringing in unconstitutional laws that have allowed the slaughter of innocents, immorality and a failure to propagate the Protestant Reformed Religion Established by Law and instead bringing in socialist policies of utilitarianism which is man rather than God centred.


iii) The Monarch to act in the line of repressing the extremities that are religiously affecting the nation. This is extremely serious in the context of today for we are seeing a complete breakdown of all that is precious to us. These extremities have included the taking out (with actual proof on one occasion as reported on ) of a House of Lords Edict resulting in the protection of banks rather than their customers.


iv) To conserve the peace, unity and tranquillity of the realm. We present towards God that once was a united nation in the 1930’s and 40’s is now at a complete divide because of the EU and its social charters that are man rather than God centred, that its laws have come through unelected officials rather than under Prayer before each Parliamentary session which is the Constitutional demand.



v)  To repress the infiltration of foreign laws and systems into our nation. Treaty of Rome countries use the principles of Corpus Juris that have their origins in Babylon whereas our Protestant system of Habeas Corpus has its origins in Jerusalem, Greece and Protestant Britain. It is obvious to see that the activities of the Roman system Henry suppressed are coming back. The EU is taking away our freedoms and so those in Christian Ministry today must demand by quoting this Act of Supremacy that our Monarch repress as she is obligated to do these infiltrations into our society.


2)  Contravention of the 1689 Act Establishing the Coronation Oath



















We are putting to God that the EU has prevented the Monarch from keeping her oath to you and that we the Prosecution plead before you that a realization of the power of God should touch and influence the Monarch – that she will make her Constitutional stand against the EU.


Here are the demands of the Oath:


  1. Maintain the statutes, laws and customs of the realm.

  2. Government of the People is the Monarch’s responsibility according to the statutes of Parliament and the laws and customs of the same.

  3. Law and justice in mercy to be executed in all judgements.

  4. The Laws of God maintained, the Monarch being obligated to do this by the utmost of her power meaning she is honour bound not to allow laws onto the statute book that contravene the Word of God, any such law being null and void according to this constitutional demand.

  5. The utmost of the Monarch’s power has to be used in relation to the ongoing profession of the Gospel and the Protestant Reformed Religion that has been established by law.

  6. Rights and privileges are given by law to Bishops and clergy meaning in reality that anyone who tries to quieten the ministry of the Gospel would be in effect guilty of High Treason.


We plead before God that none of this allowed today and that judgement should now come failing repentance.

3) We present before God European Treaties that have

Undermined Our Protestant Constitutional Acts


The European Union Flag


The very flag of the E.U. brings concern to the British Protestant determined to restore our nation back to God. This flag has twelve stars, the flag’s designer Arsene Heitz admitting that the apparent twelve star halo of Mary inspired him in his creation. This apparent reference to Mary and Rome’s apparent fascination with the lady who was a virgin clearly shows the impact Catholicism has had on the European Union and its treaties to form a political and religious pact that many Protestants see as being part of the Antichrist system. Whether the lady in Revelation is Mary however is open to question, and there is a belief that this lady in Revelation is symbolic, the twelve stars representing the tribes of Israel.


Rev. 12: 1 And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars:


Whilst some European officials deny this clear association one only has to see the antichrist attack on our God given acts to understand that this is all clearly all part of the build up to Christ Jesus return.


We examine each treaty that relates directly to the present European Union which many thought to be a mere trading agreement rather than the bringing together of a European State under Rome.


Devout Roman Catholics were clearly involved with the setting up of what was originally a group of trading nations but is now building up to be a super state ready to impact the whole World.


The Treaty of Paris 1951


This treaty was an agreement between the nations of France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, Luxembourg and The Netherlands to establish the European Coal and Steel Community, an apparent trading agreement. The trading agreement however became part of the E.U. for having been embraced into the European Order it only expired in 2002 exactly fifty years after its inception.


Treaties of Rome 1957


The two treaties of Rome, one setting up the European Economic Community, now the European Union, and another setting up the European Atomic Energy Community were signed by the then member countries Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and West Germany.


The treaties were ratified by the respective Parliaments and came into force on the 1st. January 1958.


The treaty relating to the E.E.C. laid down in its preamble intimates a determination to lay the foundations of an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe. This clearly establishes a determination to develop a progressive political integration, a determination outside of the treaty being a mere trading agreement.


British Government ministers and officials who eventually entered this Union unconstitutionally should have recognised Britain’s history of Church and State being together for within this progression of continuous treaties we see a determination to bring together the religions of the Union too, hence this Treaty can be seen as a politically motivated incentive to the multi-faith movement. This was a development separate to the removing of trading tariffs, the latter seeming to be less important that the integration itself.

There are two developments being birthed here, the first being of political integration and the second I believe being to unite the Churches of the European Union into a single order under the Pope. Rome was chosen strategically to fulfil these purposes. The very situation is obvious to those of spiritual discernment that this treaty was a coming together of the old Holy Roman Empire.



The Holy Roman Empire was presented like the European Union as a political entity, its very name however showing a religious factor in the equation. In charge of the Empire was the Pope who installed an Emperor who was originally Charlemagne the Empire being in existence from 962 to 1806.


The HRE’s objective of centralising authority into Europe was identical to that of the European Union which was coming out of this Treaty of Rome.


Rome was the seat of the Holy Roman Empire and Rome was again to be the spiritual seat of the coming European Union. There was a growing institution until the 1500’s when it was curtailed by Protestants bringing about the Reformation and so a plan has been drawn with this coming E.U. to bring Protestants back into he fold of Rome. Bibles have been changed to embrace the codices of Vaticanus and Sinaticus rather than the faithful Textus Receptus. Protestant institutions and universities of Protestant countries have been infiltrated to bring about a multi faith agenda of “Churches Together”, churches tolerant to sin and other faiths. This is the result of this Treaty of Rome, there now only being a remnant standing on Reformation principles.


The Empire had its own European Parliament called the Reichstag which passed legislation affecting member states. In Rome this was being re-born. What many thought to be a trading alliance, in fact was the re-birth of the Holy Roman Empire.


Not all communities were represented in the Reichstag but its policies affected all member states, the peoples of these states coming under it statutes and laws, even though they felt isolated from its law making processes. Ask any Council in Britain today if this sounds familiar with Europe instilling its undemocratic powers over its elected chamber.


In legal terms the Holy Roman Empire had its courts just like the European Union admittedly including Protestants into its processes but these Protestants were under a system of Rome that brought over regulation and frustration throughout member states.


With the history and the tensions between Catholic and Protestant, is this European Union being founded with this Treaty in Rome a result of Old and New Testament prophecy? Are we witnessing the building of a great administrative machine that will have a leader with answers to problems presents systems do not allow? Should we as Christians see this Treaty of Rome as a preparation for the Antichrist?  I firmly believe this is so.

In practical terms the Treaty established four institutions; a Commission, a Council of Ministers, a European Parliament and a European Court of Justice, the latter two operations being highly illegal under Britain’s Constitutional Acts which places legal obligation on the Monarch to repress in foreign infiltration into our laws. An activity to join this institution therefore under these terms from the very outset was highly treasonable.


EXCERPT FROM 1534 ACT OF SUPREMACY re-instated by Queen Elizabeth I places clear obligation on the Monarch to repress foreign authority over the affairs of Great Britain making the present intolerable situation of European Law highly illegal.


the increase of virtue in Christ's religion, and for the conservation of the peace, unity, and tranquility of this realm; any usage, foreign land, foreign authority, prescription, or any other thing or things to the contrary hereof notwithstanding.


We have a legal system that has “law and justice in mercy” right at the heart of its structure but now that our Protestant nation has placed itself under the clutches of this Roman Treaty we have a people over stressed by ridiculous applications of law, a result of the European Union’s legislations that have begun to kill our people through stress.


II Cor. 3: 5 Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God; 6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life. 7 But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away:



Is the Treaty of Rome in line with the laws and Customs of Britain or the Holy Roman Empire?


Is European Law applied with law and justice in mercy by H.M. The Queen?


Are European laws in line with the laws of God?


Is there within European law a provision for the Protestant Gospel?


If the answer is “NO” to just one of these questions – then it is clear that the Treaty of Rome is illegal in Britain.


The archbishop of bishop shall say, "Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the people of this Kingdom of England, and the dominions thereto belonging, according to the statutes in Parliament agreed on, and the laws and customs of the same?"
The King and Queen shall say, "I solemnly promise so to do."
Archbishop or bishop, "Will you to your power cause law and justice in mercy to be executed in all your judgements?"
King and Queen, "I will."
Archbishop or bishop, "Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the laws of God, the true profession of the gospel and the Protestant reformed religion established by law, and will you preserve unto the bishops and clergy of this Realm, and to the churches committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges as by law do or shall appertain unto them, or any of them?"
King and Queen, "All this I promise to do."
After this, the King and Queen laying his and her hand upon the holy Gospels, shall say,
King and Queen, "The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep: So help me God."
Then the King and Queen shall kiss the book.


A new philosophy was developing with this Treaty of Rome, a philosophy based on man’s achievements rather than God’s through us. An endless tide of monitoring progress had begun, endless league tables, this treaty eventually turning a nation into an endless war zone of stress and breakdown rather than recognizing that our sufficiency is of God; over-regulation and “letter of the law” thinking bringing death rather than the life our own constitutional acts are intended to bring.


This Treaty of Rome was being brought together to end Britain’s Protestant ethos, an ethos that had won us the Second World War with our real partners America; an ethos that is now changing to make us a nation under an Institution rather than God. Instead of promoting democracy and peace in Europe as was presented at the time as being a benefit, the Treaty has promoted over regulation and law much of which is brought together by un-elected officials undermining the British Constitutional demand that we run our own affairs under God.

The Holy Roman Empire has returned with a major change, for this time it has in its clutches Protestant Britain.  We might have been the winner of the War in Europe, but what we have lost is the peace!


The Merger Treaty 1965


This Treaty merged the executive bodies of the European Coal and Steel Community, European Atomic Energy Community, and the E.E.C. into one institutional structure.


This development brought about the E.E.C. Commission and the Council of the E.E.C., an action regarded by many as the beginnings of the change from being a mere European Economic Community to being a fully merged European Union.


First Budgetary Treaties 1970 & 1975


These two treaties amended the Treaty of Rome in relation to the budgets of the then E.E.C., the amendments still being in forces in today’s E.U.

Acts of Accession relating to enlargement 1972, 1979, 1985, 1994


A series of acts relating to the enlargement of the European Union occurred in these years, the full apparent member list of countries being as follows:






01952-07-23 23 July 1952



01952-07-23 23 July 1952



01952-07-23 23 July 1952



01952-07-23 23 July 1952



01952-07-23 23 July 1952

W. Germany[1]


01952-07-23 23 July 1952


01967-05-11 11 May 1967

01973-01-01 1 January 1973


01967-05-11 11 May 1967

01973-01-01 1 January 1973

United Kingdom

01967-05-10 10 May 1967

01973-01-01 1 January 1973


01975-06-12 12 June 1975

01981-01-01 1 January 1981


01977-03-28 28 March 1977

01986-01-01 1 January 1986


01986-06-28 28 June 1986

01986-01-01 1 January 1986


01989-07-17 17 July 1989

01995-01-01 1 January 1995


01992-03-18 18 March 1992

01995-01-01 1 January 1995


01991-07-01 1 July 1991

01995-01-01 1 January 1995


01990-07-03 3 July 1990

02004-05-01 1 May 2004

Czech Republic

01996-01-17 17 January 1996

02004-05-01 1 May 2004


01995-11-24 24 November 1995

02004-05-01 1 May 2004


01994-03-31 31 March 1994

02004-05-01 1 May 2004


01995-09-13 13 September 1995

02004-05-01 1 May 2004


01995-12-08 8 December 1995

02004-05-01 1 May 2004


01990-07-03 3 July 1990

02004-05-01 1 May 2004


01994-04-05 5 April 1994

02004-05-01 1 May 2004


01995-06-27 27 June 1995

02004-05-01 1 May 2004


01996-06-10 10 June 1996

02004-05-01 1 May 2004


01995-12-14 14 December 1995

02007-01-01 1 January 2007


01995-06-22 22 June 1995

02007-01-01 1 January 2007

* Note that the European Coal and Steel Community was
founded in 1952. From 1957 to 1993, countries applied
to join the European Economic Community.


Greenland Treaty 1984


Only the dependent territory of Greenland has voted to leave the E.E.C., there seemingly being no provision to do so for main member states.


We place before God that the coming referendum in Britain is being ruled by fear by the banks, the NWO, and the whole establishment to place a form of humanistic socialism over the people and that there are attempts to rig the vote.


Only the U.K. has held a referendum to leave the E.U., and this was in 1975 when it would seem the majority of the population saw the community as a trading group rather than a New World Order bringing in a system totally opposed to our Constitutional Acts.


Single European Act 1986


This was the first major revision of the Treaty of Rome that relates to the E.E.C. The Act established the single European market and European political integration, a dangerous act when one considers the constitutional restrictions in Britain, this act having as an objective to harmonize laws and irregularities between countries. An aim of reaching this objective by 1992 was set.


The Maastricht Treaty 1992


This was the Treaty that established the European Union and the new European currency. A concept known as the “Pillar Structure of the European Union” was created with this treaty.


Three pillars of the Union seemed to have developed with the Treaty, the first pillar relating internal matters in the E.U. The second pillar is in the area of common foreign and security policy whilst the third pillar deals with Police and judicial policy.


Ratification of the Treaty was difficult in three states, Denmark, France and Britain with Britain opting out of the social provisions.


What seriously rubs against Britain’s Constitutional Acts is the justice, home affairs and a common foreign and security policy for the Monarch is bound to abide to the Act of Supremacy and repress all such foreign infiltration into our affairs. The Act also gave European citizenship to all member peoples of the new European Union, a concept which should be absolutely rejected in Britain on constitutional grounds.


The Social Chapter of the Treaty which was initially rejected by the British Conservative Government was then embraced by the Labour regime bringing further over-regulation and nonsense to our hard pressed country gasping under the pressures of this new European state.


The latter coalition and Conservative governments have failed TO ADDRESS FULLY THE REGULATIONS OF Europe undemocratically put upon us.


All this activity in this Treaty has brought major structural and social changes to Britain, our nation no longer making its stand in the World as a Protestant nation, standing under God and showing the World that we are a God fearing victorious country standing on the promises of God. What a change from World War II, our nation now coming under the oppressive regulations that are binding the country up to the end time system of the Antichrist.


Treaty of Amsterdam 1999


This treaty with its emphasis on citizenship and individual rights has a very different structure to our own Constitutional acts, remembering that constitutionally Britain is a theocracy first, with our leaders called to follow the will of God in all laws. This is not the case in this Treaty of Europe.


The Treaty brought about the office of a “High Representative” for E.U. Foreign Policy but we know that we are covenantly together with America and not Europe as has been proved in foreign policy over many years. This is a further infiltration into the affairs of state in Britain.


Treaty of Nice 2001


Reforming the treaties of Rome and Maastrict this further interference into our affairs came into being in 2003. Opponents of the treaty see a bringing about of a greater technocratic unit isolated from the people in centralised Europe, my view being that we are witnessing a coming together of a system ideal for a dictator to take over. Ask yourself, how isolated do we feel from this New World Order operation, a concern clearly coming out in the recent Irish Referendum. The Holy Roman Empire is developing again.


Treaty of Lisbon 2007


With an apparent objective of completing a streamlining programme implemented by the Treaties of Amsterdam and Nice this Treaty has brought a realisation throughout Europe that this organisation is going at a pace that is taking away individual country identity.


The aspects of the Treaty bringing most attention are as follows:


  • More Qualified Majority Voting in the EU Council.

  • Increased Involvement of the European Parliament in legislation reducing the number of European Commissioners from 27 to 18

  • Elimination of the Pillar System brought in at Maastricht

  • Creation of a President of the European Council

  • Creation of a High Representative for Foreign Affairs

  • Legal binding of a Charter of Fundamental (human) rights. These human rights follow a principle developed by Karel Vasek with the headings of liberty, equality and fraternity.

  • A treaty establishing many of the provisions of the rejected European Constitution, the Treaty believed by many to be a Constitution with another name! Prime Minister Gordon Brown signed the Treaty in a quiet setting after the main signing by other nations.


The sinister background to this Treaty brings up many questions in relation to the sovereignty of member nations, particularly as member nations have been showing concern over losing their national identity. The usual technique of the New World Order is to bring about economic decline and provide an answer in relation to bringing about their call to a One World Government and a One World Religion. Economic recovery will be shown to come with more international integration of government and world peace will be promised through multi faith cults like the Anglicans through integration of religions. This integration operation will have a dynamic leader that will fool even the very elect! It’s an old trick but very effective. It is not surprising so many are being fooled by it for the Bible gives this warning.


Matthew 24: 24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.


Just wait for these integration policies to arise out of the instability in the World both in international relations and finances. No wonder the Bible warns us of the end times. The E.U. is the European Wing of the NWO Government in the making. We as the remnant Church must be prepared to stand up to Baal.



II COR. 6: 15 And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?


We put to God that there has been Unconstitutional Laws and Statutes put on the People since joining the European Union

Examples of Over-regulation


Crazy regulations are part of living in a European Union member state. Gone are the common sense values of our constitutional acts which demanded that law be applied with “law and justice in mercy”. Gone are the Biblical principals of applying law with wisdom from what is still constitutionally a Protestant state, ridiculous laws being applied by the letter bringing health problems and misery throughout our nation.



Proverbs 4: 5 Get wisdom, get understanding: forget it not; neither decline from the words of my mouth. 6 Forsake her not, and she shall preserve thee: love her, and she shall keep thee. 7 Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding.


  • E.U. regulations have been set up in relation as to how far a banana curves, this being important in relation to weighing up its size!


  • A Yorkshire Bus Company looking to get over E.U. safety regulations applied a rule getting passengers to get off the bus half way through a journey, then getting them to get on the bus with the same driver!


  • The European Standardisation Committee has introduced voluntary guidelines for the height of swings in playgrounds, this height being no more than three metres high. How did Councils manage before the issue of guidelines or did they use common sense then?




  • The Daily Telegraph in 2003 reported that the latest E.U. requirement on farmers was that they had to label each egg produced with their name and home address, the details of the hen who laid the egg, the method of production, and the code for the producer packer and a sell by date. A Brussels E.U. official stated that this would be a nice job for a farmer’s wife! This is an example of over regulation bringing massive increased costs to businesses. It’s barmy! Which one should she label first?  


This is just a sample of many many stories flying around that have given much amusement to many people, but these stories have behind them a very sinister attack giving managers, teachers, doctors, lawyers etc. etc. terrific pressures preventing them in many cases from doing their jobs right, these examples going against the customs of how we have operated for centuries thus making these laws constitutionally unsound in Britain.



III. The archbishop of bishop shall say, "Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the people of this Kingdom of England, and the dominions thereto belonging, according to the statutes in Parliament agreed on, and the laws and customs of the same?"


The examples given are laws not within our customs and are this constitutionally illegal.



The Infiltration into our Education System


The European Union in its bid to be part of promoting the New World Order had been steadily infiltrating the Education System of Britain to move it away from its successful Protestant ethos so that new generations can bring about a society devoid of radical and determined Christianity thus making way for the end time system of the Antichrist.


In the majority of countries in the European Union there is an inspectorate to see that the education of children is in line with European rather than national standards. This is a gross interference in the bringing up of our children who are now showing real signs of losing their national identity in a globalised world. Indeed the Council of the European Union admits that there have been economic and social changes in Europe which a teacher has to cope with. This admission of failure by the European Union is refreshing because it is because of their disgusting infiltration into our education system that there have been these changes bringing distress, heartache, nervous breakdown and even suicide.


Had we kept to the principles of our God given constitutional acts, then we would have had stability in education and in other fields. Now we have a breaking society with today’s youth being referred to as the “lost generation.” We need to get out of this evil of Europe now and return to the stability of our Protestant faith.



Mal. 3: 6 For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed. 7 Even from the days of your fathers ye are gone away from mine ordinances, and have not kept them. Return unto me, and I will return unto you, saith the LORD of hosts. But ye said, Wherein shall we return?

4) We put to God Solutions



Proverbs 22: 28 Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set.


It would seem that in practice the ancient landmark of our constitutional acts has been removed. To restore our nation back to God there has to be a time of deep rooted repentance beginning from the top so as our nation once more can stand in obedience with our mighty Creator.


The following actions are required by God in this nation to enable our title of “Great” to be restored.


Our nation needs to repent for the lack of awareness of our great Protestant constitutional acts. The Acts of Supremacy of 1534 and 1559 are still in force yet little is known of them.


An action to educate the population of Great Britain including our children and all immigrants need to occur. It needs to be understood that living in this country involves giving adherence to these Protestant acts establishing our nation for all time as a Protestant country of the Protestant Reformed Religion. Lack of adherence will be seen as an act of high treason.


Living in Great Britain involves understanding that the nation is obligated before God to increase virtue of Christ’s Religion. As this is a statement of the Protestant Reformation the nation from its income needs to support and encourage Ministers of the Protestant Reformed Faith to carry out this task on behalf of the Monarch who is by law bound to oversee this awesome calling.



The Anglican Cult to be a Church again needs to rid itself of all it pagan infiltrations outlined in our booklet The Anglican Cult and become a fully endorsed Protestant Church without high altars, un-authorised “Bibles” and the like.


All extremity in the nation must be dealt with severely so the nation once more can be at peace., all foreign infiltration into our affairs being repressed.


That it be fully understood in the nation that any attempt to repeal or change our Protestant Constitutional Acts be seen as an act of High Treason. This includes any future attempt to change the Coronation Oath established in 1689 to any multi-faith agenda. The Monarch must be Defender of the Faith, not defender of faiths.


Those in Government and in the State Church who have not adhered to the acts be brought to account in a Ecclesiastical Court that needs to be set up with Ministers of the Protestant Reformed Religion Established by Law.


A State Document be produced for all servants of the Monarch who are honour bound to keep the terms of her Oath. The Protestant laws, statutes and customs must be maintained with law and justice in mercy executed in all judgments.


All laws not in line with the laws of God be understood never to have been laws, there being in our Constitutional acts a demand for laws to be in line with the Word of God.


That the nation understands as Queen Elizabeth I understood that the Crown is subject to no power except Christ Jesus alone. Thus the contents of this booklet is a Thus saith the Lord to Queen and Country.


Any attempt to quieten the Preaching of the Protestant Gospel be seen as an Act of High Treason thus this booklet is a warning to forces suppressing Ministers who preach on the streets. They are to be left alone to preach God’s Holy Word.


In view of the move to multi-faith and European integration and globalisation that the Monarch re-affirm her Protestant vows to keep her nation under God.


The black and white floors plus the High Altars of Cathedrals and what is known as Churches in the land be removed along with gargoyles, artefacts and relics of Baal worship so evident in Anglican property.


Gnosticism and pagan “Bibles” coming from codices like Vaticanus and Sinaiticus be outlawed from the land including schools, universities and “churches” – there being a repentant move back to the true Authorised by the Monarch Bible described as “wisdom, royal law, the lively oracles of God.”



A teaching be given to the nation of the significance of Zadok as opposed to Eli, the Zadok priesthood having been referred to in the Coronation Service of 1953. This principle firmly emphasises the needs of God before the needs of man, the Church being the Body of Christ Jesus and not a physical building.


The complete rejection of Corpus Juris in favour of Habeas Corpus and Magna Carta be fully understood in the nation.


All Roman Catholics be ousted from the Royal Family in the same way that Protestants cannot be in line for Papal office.


Wales uses the Christian flag of Wales rather than the pagan counterfeit.


Wales, Scotland and Ireland (Northern Ireland at first with the South being given the opportunity to be a Protestant nation too as an equal partner in the U.K.) leaving their controlled under Brussels Parliaments to enjoy the liberty of Great Britain’s Protestant Constitution.


Ireland (including the South if they choose) to embrace the doctrines of Patrick rather the Alexandrian doctrines of Catholicism.


The special relationship with America recognised as being a result of the Mayflower Compact.


Immediate withdrawal from the European Union, the Holy Roman Empire in disguise.


Acceptance that the British people were conned into thinking they were joining a trading community rather than a political and religious one.


Recognition that European Law is not in line with the laws and customs of Britain.


Recognition that our nation has been over-stretched as a result of European Law and so a process of bringing back our nation to applying law with law and justice in mercy must begin.


Removal of European “poltical correctness” from the nation.


Restoration of our Education System under British perspectives rather than European Law perspectives.


Immediate action to prevent any more unborn children being slaughtered and all those responsible for the past slaughter brought to justice.



The philosophical spirit in Britain may scoff at the commands of God but God is really giving a final warning in relation to judgment which has already begun.



I Cor. 3: 18 Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise. 19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness. 20 And again, The Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain. 21 Therefore let no man glory in men. For all things are your's; 22 Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas, or the world, or life, or death, or things present, or things to come; all are your's; 23 And ye are Christ's; and Christ is God's.


God longs for Britain to repent and become great again but this cannot be the case until the nation comes to its knees before him.



John 3: 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.


This is the only “begotten Son of God”, begotten not created, of the same substance as the Father longing for Britain to back to him. as Nicodemus found earthy logic is futile, this truly is God pleading to the nation to come back to him.


We trust the answer to be yes, or else there are eternal consequence of the disobedience of bringing a once great nation under the control of the Antichrist, an action contrary to the demands of our constitutional acts.

5)  We put to God the work of Daniel Hanaan MEP in relation to the European Union


False Good promoted with millions of euros – flying journalists into Brussels to receive good news story propaganda; member state projects designed to receive maximum publicity presenting itself as a force for good, peace, freedom and democracy with opposition presented as being against these values. These values are the basis of the euro crisis.


Phenomenal waster is the EU whilst member states try and balance their books, something the EU seems incapable of doing, and elaborate projects are thought of and put into action at taxpayers’ expense.


The presentation of the notion that becoming a large state is beautiful is one that denies the facts. China is not wealthier than Hong Kong as the EU is not wealthier per head of population than Switzerland. Eighteen of the top twenty richest countries per head of population are small ---- so where is this coming from that says that if you are big – you are richer? The exceptions include USA that is a group of decentralised small states rather than the centralised EU. The richest countries in the world per head of population …….


  1. Lichtenstein

  2. Qatar

  3. Luxembourg

  4. Bermuda

  5. Singapore

  6. Jersey

  7. Falkland Islands

  8. Norway

  9. Brunei

  10. Hong Kong

  11. UAE

  12. USA

  13. Guernsey

  14. Cayman Islands

  15. Switzerland

  16. Gibraltar

  17. Netherlands

  18. Austria

  19. Australia

  20. Kuwait


That the EU is undemocratic in that one unelected President Jose Manuel Durao Barroso declared; Governments are not always right. If governments were always right we would not have the situation that we have today. Decisions taken by the most democratic institutions in the world are very often wrong. So Lord, we put to you that the EU solution is laws of unelected officials, the choice of the people rejected for the choice of an intelligentsia.


To quote Daniel Hannan on how the EU creates institutions and pays institutions to be political outworkers of its corrupt philosophies……. When preparing the document that became the European Constitution, and then the Lisbon Treaty, the RU authorities made a great show of consulting the people. In 2003, 200 organisations, representing civil society were invited to submit their suggestions on what the draft should contain. Interested in how these 200 bodies had been selected, I put down a written question asking which of them received grants from the EU. After some toing and froing, the answer eventually came back: all of them.


You see how the system works? The EU sets up and funds an interest group. That group duly demands that the EU seizes more powers, The EU then announces that, in response to popular demand, it is extending its jurisdiction.


Virtually every field of activity has come approved, EU sponsored pressure groups to campaign for greater integration: the European Union of Journalists, the European Women’s Lobby, the European Cyclists Federation. These are not independent associations which just happen to be in receipt of EU funds. They are, in most cases, creatures of the European Commission, wholly dependent on Brussels for their existence.


Nor is the racket limited to pan-European bodies headquartered in Brussels. The EU has been active in subsidising established NGO’s within the nation states too. It starts harmlessly enough, with one off grants for specific purposes. After a while, the NGO realises that it is worth investing in a “Europe Officer” whose job, in effect, is to secure larger grants. As the subventions become permanent, more “Europe Officers” are hired. Soon, the handouts are taken for granted and factored into the organisation’s budget. Once this stage is reached, the EU is in position to call in favours.


One example will illustrate what I’m talking about. When he introduced the Bill to ratify the Lisbon Treaty in 2007, the then foreign secretary, David Milliband made a great song and dance about the fact that in wasn’t just Labour Europhiles who backed the text. W whole range of NGO’s, he told the House of Commons, had also come out in favour: “The NSPCC has pledged its support, as have One World Action, Action Aid and Oxfam” he said being pleased with himself. “Environmental organisations support the treaty provisions on sustainable development and even the commission of bishops supports the treaty. This is a coalition, not of ideology but integrity!


Integrity? A few moments on the Internet revealed that every organisation he had cited was in receipt of EU subventions. Most of them it turned out, had also received grants from the British government. Hardly surprising, then, that they should dutifully endorse a treaty supported by their paymasters.


What was surprising was the extent of their financial dependency. When Mr Milliband sat down, I fired off a written question asking the European Commission how much money it had paid these organisations. It turned out that, in the previous year, Action Aid, the NSPCC, One World Action and Oxfam had among them been given 43,051,542,95. Daniel Hannan – A Doomed Marriage: Britain and Europe. Notting Hill Editions.


In contrast a letter of the law impoverishment programme for Charities and NGO’s that oppose the EU, particularly those upholding Constitutions of nations and visions of founders, the EU infiltrating with its education programmes organisations that once stood for the true Gospel, our Monarch promised to propagate. As is the case in this ministry legal protection from threat is removed and those of EU social charter background come and make false accusation against the founders who are placed on an isolate and impoverishment programme designed to alienate the organization from society. Petty faults are found in the organisation that are expanded to appear as major corruption even in EU controlled courts of law. The organisations are threatened that if they speak ouyt it would cost them far more than they can afford. This is exactly what has happened to this ministry which is brought out into the open with EU controlled councils, Social Services, Charities and controlled churches coming against such ministries with gusto so that these ministries are placed in a corner awaiting their execution.


Back to Daniel Hannan …..  The other body which Mr Milliband cited, the commission of Bishops, was a little harder to identify, but patient Googling revealed that its full name was the “Commission of Bishops Conferences of the European Community.” Far from being an episcopal body that just happened to back closer union, it was a Brussels based outfit whose purpose was to promote reflection, based on the Roman Catholic Church’s social teaching (what came against Sheila in her choice - ) on the challenges facing a united Europe. In other words, while seeking to give the impression of broad support for a new transfer of powers to Brussels, the British Foreign Secretary was reduced to citing a body whose sole purpose is to interact with EU institutions, and which would be out of business if the EU disappeared. The French call the phenomenon “deformation professionelle”: the tendency; perhaps subliminal, to form opinions according to the dictates of your professional self-interest. Daniel Hannan – A Doomed Marriage: Britain and Europe. Notting Hill Editions.


Before God we note that this ministry reported the behaviour of the charities cited by Daniel Hannan to the British Charity Commission stating that it is not the role of charities to promote political ideals (particularly for monetary reward) but no action was taken. Our stand as a British Registered Charity is to uphold the British Constitutional Acts that call us to expose such corruptions and propagate the Protestant Reformed Religion Established by Law rather than a quango of Bishops reporting to Brussels.


Daniel Hannan reports that Britain has placed far more into the EU than taken out except for the year 1975 the year of the last referendum when clearly figures were manipulated to draw the British people out of their democracy into a European dictatorship, and we can expect the same this year! Our presentation to the Court today is not primarily about money but the nation’s honour to God as our provider but we place to you Lord that membership of the EU has been and will continue to be a financial disaster.


We put to God quotes from those to whom Britain has placed itself under and appeal to God that the blinding of the eyes of British people be removed at the coming referendum so that it is realised that their choice is being taken away …….


From now on monetary policy, usually an essential part of national sovereignty, will be decided by a truly European Institution.

Willem F Duisenburg. ECB President 1998-2004 – 31 12 98


National sovereignty in foreign and security policy will soon prove itself to be a product of the imagination as none of the member states of the European Union has the potential or weight for a global role on its own.

Gerrard Schroder, German Chancellor, 1998-2005 19 01 99


Our task is the creation of a new constitutional order for a new united Europe.

Peter Hain, UK Minister for Europe 2001-02 – 21 03 02


If the answer is No, the vote will probably have to be done again, because it absolutely has to be a yes.

Jean-Luc Dehaene, Belgian Prime Minister 1992 -99 – June 2004 – on a possible Belgian Referendum on the EU Constitution.


If it’s a Yes we will say “on we go” and if it’s a No we will say “we continue”

Jean Claude Juncker, Luxembourg PM 1995-2013 and President of the European Commission 2014 – 25 05 05 on the French Referendum on the European Constitution.


The euro has been a rock of stability, as illustrated by the contrasting fortunes of Iceland and Ireland.

Richard Corbett, MEP 1996-2009 and 2014  16 01 09


The European Union must make a decisive step towards a federal economic government.

Andrew Duff MEP September 2011


When it becomes serious you have to lie.

Jean Claude Juncker, Luxembourg PM 1995-2013 and President of the European Commission 2014 –


Daniel Hannan – Why Vote Leave 2016

6)  We put to God the work of a group of Anglican Clergy and Laity in relation to the European Union – 101 reasons for leaving the EU



7)  We Put to God Bad Business Practices


  1. To give 19.6 billion pounds per annum (350 million pounds a week) to Brussels with a small amount back with controls – resulting in a loss to Britain of 11.1 billion pounds per annum

  2. To take on an entirely different legal system preventing to right to defence, having to prove innocence if one can afford it.

  3. For the UK Government to present pre-referendum EU propaganda to the British people in a glossy leaflet costing 9.3 million pounds.

  4. For the UK Government pre referendum to go on PROJECT FEAR calling our exit a leap into the dark when it is an open door to daylight.

  5. To now lose 2 World Wars for EU membership has cost us self-determination with 28 unelected judges now above a national elected Parliament; 60% of our laws now EU; over the last years 5,600 new laws on business alone.

  6. The attack on fishing and agriculture to be removed.










Courtroom of God - 25 April 2016
Bringing the EU Quizlings to Justice
Awaiting Video

20 04 16 - EU LEAVE INTERCESSION - BRIAN MASON at the White Cliffs 

Published on Apr 21, 2016

The wartime intercession of Rees Howells goes on, this time through Brian Mason trained in the 70's by Samuel Rees Howells.

The danger to Great Britain is clear, and that is to protect our Christian Heritage, undermined so greatly at this gateway to Britain - The White Cliffs of Dover.

But now a change - the unconstitutional takeover by foreign powers has now been identified as Britain now has opportunity to return to its own Elizabethan Settlement rather than the rituals of an EU bound by satanic corruptions.

On a windy day (hence the background noise) Brian Mason walked on top of the cliffs to intercede

Upholding the original vision of Rees Howells in reaching every creature with the Gospel, the Gospel of the true Bible, not the Alexandrian counterfeits of the Emerging Church.

Love to hear from you .......

For HD1080p adjust settings

Word from the Lord through David P Griffiths, 23/04/16

“The Upside-down Cross of Canterbury”


“This will remain at Canterbury (clearly seen on the video) as long as a high altar remains. For Christ does not live in holy places made with hands, but in the hearts of true believers who are the temples of the Holy Ghost.


“For when the royal priesthood of believers was mentioned in the intercession at Canterbury, a shock wave went through the system, that momentarily shook the system of the upside-down cross.


“The presentation of the upside-down cross is one that shows Peter not as worthy as the Christ, a doctrine based on there being a separate priesthood. But as you know from the Word of God, there is only one priesthood, along the line of Melchizedek, for which those truly born again have their sins removed without continuous confession to a priest, or as in the charismatic movement, a deliverance pastor. For through the blood, the slate is wiped clean, & one becomes the temple of the Holy Ghost.


“And so, Peter became such a being, not to be venerated as less worthy on an upside-down cross, but to be recognised as a joint heir with Christ, just as you all are who know Me.


“An altar made with hands brings a separation between God & man. It is a rebuilding of the veil Calvary opened up, & is of the doctrine of Baal, whose altar needs to be removed so as to bring peace not only to Canterbury, but to the entire Anglican Communion that is in complete disarray due to its adherence to Baal.


“I therefore hand over responsibility from the courtroom of God to the Bible College of Wales Continuing, to uphold the Constitutional Acts of the nation in line with the Word of God & the Elizabethan Settlement, the Act of Settlement being an Act that draws a line between religion of the separate priesthood & the royal priesthood of believers, the role of My College being to perfect the saints for the work of the ministry; & that work, David, on the Constitutional Acts of the nation, is now to come to the fore. Such is My will, that you be in the House of  Lords to bring attention to the Upper House to what is really going on in the nation, which is a matter of spirit first & temporal second, so that the people will know that Great Britain is to be run by My Spirit, hence there being prayers before each law-making session in Parliament, rather than adherence to a foreign power, which the EU has done, hence it being My will that unrepentant members associated with this organisation be brought to justice in the new Parliament.


“This is the decision of the courtroom of God.”


Brian Mason - The National Church & its Constitutional Obligations 

Published on Apr 21, 2016

The Church of England has Constitutional Obligations to uphold the Pre-Eminence of Christ Jesus; the Protestant Reformed Religion Established by Law; and ensure that no foreign power comes in and removes our heritage.

Yet years of compromise have crept in so Rees Howells trained Intercessor Brian Mason stands in the gap taking on Baal and its Luciferian counterfeit at Canterbury Cathedral, there being a sun made upside down cross, a symbol of Romanism appearing in the video in the process of the casting out of the infiltration to bring the conditions for Britain and its national Church to uphold the doctrine of the Royal Priesthood of Believers, remove the high altars and uphold our Protestant Christian heritage.

Upholding the original vision of Rees Howells in reaching every creature with the Gospel, the Gospel of the true Bible, not the Alexandrian counterfeits of the Emerging Church.

Love to hear from you .......

For HD1080p adjust settings


Brian Mason - Sir Winston Churchill & UK Sovereignty 

Published on Apr 21, 2016

Sir Winston Churchill made his God given stand for UK sovereignty not for it to be given away by future generations denying the very Constitution so many gave their lives for.

Here Rees Howells trained Intercessor Brian Mason stands in the grounds of the house of our former PM upholding the very Constitution Sir Winston & King George VI stood for - looking for our nation again to have its sovereignty restored.

Upholding the original vision of Rees Howells in reaching every creature with the Gospel, the Gospel of the true Bible, not the Alexandrian counterfeits of the Emerging Church.

Love to hear from you .......

For HD1080p adjust settings



Published on Apr 25, 2016

25 04 16 EU QUISLINGS BEFORE THE THRONE OF ALMIGHTY GOD - COURTROOM OF GOD Part 1 - BREAKTHROUGH INTERCESSION - Barristers David & Lindsay Griffiths. Margaret & Marjorie

Do the Constitutional Acts of Great Britain line up with the treaties of the EU? Placed before the Father in the Courtroom of God and God speaks!

Upholding the original vision of Rees Howells in reaching every creature with the Gospel, the Gospel of the true Bible, not the Alexandrian counterfeits of the Emerging Church.

Love to hear from you .......

For HD1080p adjust settings



This was the word given by David when meeting with a small group of Ministry leaders on 17 November 2015.


"Nation of Britain, I have loved you with a love which has not ceased, despite the state of apostasy and degradation into which you have fallen. My anger towards those church leaders who have taught false things in my Name, and encouraged others to believe and act as they do, is intense and my judgment upon them will be severe. Yet I have compassion upon those who have been like sheep without godly shepherds; and my heart still longs to exercise mercy upon a nation whose forefathers upheld my Name and took my Word to the ends of the earth; a nation whose belief in the truth of my Word framed godly laws and inspired a culture of uprightness.


"Rather than rely on Me and my faithfulness to you, you chose, for worldly purposes, to join yourself to an institution which has denied my Name and refused to acknowledge Me in its councils. My fierce anger is upon that institution on account of its rebellion, its defiant rejection of me and its hardness of heart towards my ancient people Israel.


"I warn you now that the European institution will not repent, even though I bring disaster and destruction upon it. I urge you, O Britain still beloved by Me for the sake of your godly forefathers, come out of her, so that you may not be caught up in that same destruction, for I am even now arising in judgment to bring to nothing what she has sought to achieve. If you will separate yourself from her declared rejection of God, I will have mercy upon you and restore my hand of protection; and I will use you once again to bring light to many lost in the darkness which is now steadily increasing.

"Hear Me, O once godly nation and respond to my call, or you also will come to ruin in that same judgment of destruction. This is not my will for you, but you must choose the course which you will take. I urge you to respond to Me and choose life under my hand of discipline and protection, rather than death in the disaster which is even now coming upon Europe."


David Noakes


bottom of page