top of page

How the Constitutional Acts of Great Britain have in times past given protection all

over the World - but now undermined!

An Examination by Rev  David P Griffiths 

Contents of Part 1: 

Great Britain’s

Main Constitutional Acts                    

Acts of Supremacy 1534 & 1559                


First Elizabeth                                             

Act Establishing the Coronation Oath     

Demands of the Oath                                 

Coronation Service of 1953                       

Act of Settlement 1700 following

The Bill of Rights 1689                               

Habeas Corpus                                            

Worldwide Throne

Deuteronomy 30:1-10 (King James Version)

And it shall come to pass, when all these things are come upon thee, the blessing and the curse, which I have set before thee, and thou shalt call them to mind among all the nations, whither the LORD thy God hath driven thee,  

And shalt return unto the LORD thy God, and shalt obey his voice according to all that I command thee this day, thou and thy children, with all thine heart, and with all thy soul;  

That then the LORD thy God will turn thy captivity, and have compassion upon thee, and will return and gather thee from all the nations, whither the LORD thy God hath scattered thee.  

If any of thine be driven out unto the outmost parts of heaven, from thence will the LORD thy God gather thee, and from thence will he fetch thee:  

And the LORD thy God will bring thee into the land which thy fathers possessed, and thou shalt possess it; and he will do thee good, and multiply thee above thy fathers.  

And the LORD thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, that thou mayest live.  

And the LORD thy God will put all these curses upon thine enemies, and on them that hate thee, which persecuted thee.  

And thou shalt return and obey the voice of the LORD, and do all his commandments which I command thee this day.  

And the LORD thy God will make thee plenteous in every work of thine hand, in the fruit of thy body, and in the fruit of thy cattle, and in the fruit of thy land, for good: for the LORD will again rejoice over thee for good, as he rejoiced over thy fathers:  

If thou shalt hearken unto the voice of the LORD thy God, to keep his commandments and his statutes which are written in this book of the law, and if thou turn unto the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul.

Nations that are called of God have obligations to fulfil, none more important than the obligation to hear from God. This is why we have Christian Constitutional Acts with a Monarch who is constitutionally called to bring God's Word to the nation, ministers of the "Protestant Reformed Religion Established by Law" being commissioned to bring this about.


Lessons to be learnt from Deuteronomy 30


1)  The Prophet lays down the choice between the blessing and the curse.

2)  God calls the nation to obey his voice and return to HIM!

3)  The Nation on obeying God is brought back together.

4)  There are no boundaries to this homecoming.

5)  The Nation will prosper abundantly.

6)  All this cannot be achieved without the shedding of blood, the death and resurrection of Christ Jesus who shed his blood for us is in the heart of the true believer.

7)  Those who have come against the anointed will suffer the curse. A warning is on this site to all those who have suppressed our Christian Heritage. The Hour of Judgment hath come.

8)  Obedience to God is the key.

9)  The recession will be over if .......

10) It is a whole hearted commitment.


In light of this scripture we present the Constitutional Acts of Great Britain.



I Timothy 6:10 For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.


Chilling words writes Rev. Dr. David P. Griffiths. Further words say that “For God so loved the World that he gave his only begotten son.” Our wonderful God was prepared to give his only begotten (of the same substance – not created) Son to die for the sins of the World.


Yet Britain before the recession with its new founded “love of money” ethos sought the riches of this world by ignoring our God given precious constitutional acts so as to become rich. The ethos has brought poverty and despair.


God had given us a commonwealth of nations, many of which had dear souls suffering in terrible poverty while Britain was enjoying itself in Sodom and Gomorrah style liberty. God's intention was for us to have a Commonwealth of Britain that would share God given wealth. After all – the title is “COMMON –WEALTH!”.


But no! we sought after riches rather than adherence to the ancient landmark of our constitutional acts. What you find before you is a God given prophecy of exposure and study clearly showing how far Britain and its National Church have strayed from fulfilling

God’s purposes and calling in the World.


At the end ye will find a call to repentance. Will the nation obey or continue on the road to further sorrows including the eternity of hell for all those unrepentant before God?



I Timothy 6:10 For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.


Chilling words writes David P. Griffiths. Further words say that “For God so loved the World that he gave his only begotten son.” Our wonderful God was prepared to give his only begotten (of the same substance – not created) Son to die for the sins of the World.


Yet Britain before the recession with its new founded “love of money” ethos sought the riches of this world by ignoring our God given precious constitutional acts so as to become rich. The ethos has brought poverty and despair.


God had given us a commonwealth of nations, many of which had dear souls suffering in terrible poverty while Britain was enjoying itself in Sodom and Gomorrah style liberty. God's intention was for us to have a Commonwealth of Britain that would share God given wealth. After all – the title is “COMMON –WEALTH!”.


But no! we sought after riches rather than adherence to the ancient landmark of our constitutional acts. What you find before you is a God given prophecy of exposure and study clearly showing how far Britain and its National Church have strayed from fulfilling

God’s purposes and calling in the World.


At the end ye will find a call to repentance. Will the nation obey or continue on the road to further sorrows including the eternity of hell for all those unrepentant before God?


Part 1: Great Britain's Main Constitutional Acts

The Acts of Supremacy 1534 & 1559


These great acts of Parliament establish Great Britain not as a democracy but as a theocracy under God.


This principle must be re-established in Britain which again is to be a God fearing society if we are to regain the title of Great Britain. We are to be a nation in bonds if we are to regain the title of Great Britain. We are to be free of all foreign infiltration into our laws and customs if we are to regain the title of Great Britain.


Oh! What a shambles our nation has become, the solution being to come back to our great British Bible authorised by the Monarch in 1611 and our great British Protestant Constitutional acts that made our nation great.


Widespread disregard of our precious scriptures and our accompanying acts has brought our nation on to the slippery slide to destruction, a remnant making a stand for acts still on the statute books – acts that alongside our Great British Bible made our nation GREAT!


Ephesians 6:18-20 (King James Version)

Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints;

And for me, that utterance may be given unto me, that I may open my mouth boldly, to make known the mystery of the gospel, 

For which I am an ambassador in bonds: that therein I may speak boldly, as I ought to speak.


As a theocracy we have no rights at all as a nation except to have a Monarch who is obligated by law to hear from God and act accordingly. This is our Monarch’s position as Head of State and Head of the Church of England. An awesome task, a task way above the arguments of General Elections for the ways of man and “political correctness” are foolishness to God, and so Great Britain has two specific acts of Parliament placing God as the Head of our nation, his Monarch being his mouthpiece to the Nation.


The Prophets however are subject to the prophets and so we will examine whether or not our nation has honoured and moved in the ways of our Constitutional acts. We will examine whether that heart of God has moved in this once great country or whether an infiltration has come in to remove our great Protestant heritage and place us once more under the claws of Antichrist Rome.


The Monarch is our nation’s Prophet of God. Is this still the case or has she been taken away on the side of destruction that leads to Antichrist Rome? It is our constitutional obligation to judge! We will be judging by looking at the constitutional demand on the Monarch beginning with the two Acts of Supremacy which must be upheld passionately if we are to return to the days of our greatness. Anything less will result in “Rubbish British” continuing to spew out its population and losing all its wealth to a world dominated by a New World Order that can only be described as a system that lends itself to being the Revelational Antichrist John the Divine foresaw!


1 Corinthians 14:29-33 (King James Version)

Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the other judge.  

If any thing be revealed to another that sitteth by, let the first hold his peace.  

For ye may all prophesy one by one, that all may learn, and all may be comforted.  

And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets.  

For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.


History seems to state that the original Act of Supremacy of 1534 seems to have been brought in as an act of convenience for Henry VIII so as to enable him to secure a divorce from Catherine of Aragon. Of course it is true to say that that the act’s freedom from Rome would enable him to marry Anne Boleyn. What is far more important however is to understand that all this was happening at a time of religious instability in the nation!

Henry was bringing about the dissolution of the monasteries, bastions of the religious order of the day and Luther had already issued his Theses. Corruption was being exposed in the religious order, that same corruption needing to be exposed today and I during 2007 issued 95 Theses on religious orders for God is bringing about a reformation today that embraces the grievances of Luther but explicitly shows how the same corruptions of Satanism are exposing themselves today in twenty first century terms.


As it is today religious tensions then were rife in the nation too. Within this context Henry VIII with the assistance of Thomas Cromwell brought about a break from the jurisdiction of Rome in spiritual, legal and financial terms, a link which is now in the process of being brought back with Britain’s new found allegiance to Roman treaties. 


I believe that today’s activities in Parliament are restoring the allegiance to Rome that Henry VIII and Cromwell broke and that there is a need for another Cromwell to rise up and bring our national back to its constitutional greatness.


As we have discussed the Act of Supremacy, 1534 has far deeper aspects to it than it just being an act of convenience for Henry. Deep spiritual consequences of Henry’s actions occurred for all of this was within the framework of the Protestant Reformation that began with Luther’s placing of 95 Theses on the door of Rome’s Wittenberg Church in Germany.


These very important theses exposed the corruptions that are still flying around “Church” in Britain. Today we have a veritable Commercial Babylon promoted by the Roman Catholic Church infiltrating “churches” with alternative “Bibles” that tell a very different story than our precious Constitutional Authorised Version and Luther saw man having access to God who alone pardons sins on the repentance of the individual.


Roman Catholicism was presenting a priest between man and God. Luther broke that and Britain followed by establishing a Constitution of a Monarch who would be Governor over Church and nation. Instead of the codices of the Vatican Great Britain would have a Church that would have a Protestant Bible that people would understand and have access themselves to the Father!


Stability was to come to Great Britain for we were to have a Bible that did not change unlike today’s modern translations that show a very different God. With the “new translations” we have a culture that disrespects fellow man. Violence and decadence is increasing and so we have a Constitution that embraced Luther’s Theses declaring that man was naturally sinful but that man could have salvation by seeking God, his heart being revived by the presence of Christ to do good works rather than the filth and immorality that has come about since the change to the Catholicism of the European Union and the Bible translations of the Vatican.


In the days before the Act of Supremacy 1534 Priests were regarded as people that did not have to honour the law of a land and so with this move of God in the 1500’s we have an understanding developing of the Royal Priesthood of Believers where no man was seen as more important than the next. This is today being undermined. What has come into Britain is an emphasis on intellectualism that has come from a master class philosophy, the true Word declaring that you have to become a fool before you can become wise, something Britain has forgotten. If it had remembered this it would be keeping to this in its education programme. Instead we have emphasis on results rather than wisdom, a recipe for failure.


The emphasis on leadership today is breaking the principles of the Theses and our Constitutional Acts too in that Roman Catholicism believed that if people had the Bible they would form their own opinions making the Bible more important than the Church. This is happening today with people being told to listen to their leaders rather than study diligently the Word themselves. Luther stood against this and God was developing a Great British nation in the 1500’s of people themselves hearing from God.


Today, all the religious garbage of Catholicism has invaded us again with the State Church embracing all the images, crucifixes and Druidic clothing that Luther wrote against in his Theses. Yet in 1500’s Great Britain we have God in moving against the religious idolatry being embraced once more by the establishment of Britain. We have even endured the unconstitutional activity of a recent Prime Minister taking part in a ceremony that looks to turn physical bread into the actual Body of Christ. In addition to this one former cabinet Minister of the last Labour Government was associated with the sinister Roman Cult Opus Dei! How can that be possible if our Protestant Constitutional acts are to be honoured?


Thus we have the 1534 Act and I am moving aside all the world’s issues to say implicitly that God was bringing about the Protestant Reformation in which he would have a nation that would have a great Empire that would establish the Protestant Reformed Religion around the World. In addition to this there is a responsibility of all Protestant Clergy to expose the demeanours of Catholicism so as to free up the people to be truly born again. Instead the once great Protestant denominations and groupings are embracing Rome bringing about “salvations” to the Sun God rather than the begotten SON OF GOD!


1534 ACT OF SUPREMACY. Albeit the king's Majesty justly and rightfully is and ought to be the supreme head of the Church of England, and so is recognized by the clergy of this realm in their convocations, yet nevertheless, for corroboration and confirmation thereof, and for increase of virtue in Christ's religion within this realm of England, and to repress and extirpate all errors, heresies, and other enormities and abuses heretofore used in the same, be it enacted, by authority of this present Parliament, that the king, our sovereign lord, his heirs and successors, kings of this realm, shall be taken, accepted, and reputed the only supreme head in earth of the Church of England, called Anglicans Ecclesia; and shall have and enjoy, annexed and united to the imperial crown of this realm, as well the title and style thereof, as all honors, dignities, preeminences, jurisdictions, privileges, authorities, immunities, profits, and commodities to the said dignity of the supreme head of the same Church belonging and appertaining; and that our said sovereign lord, his heirs and successors, kings of this realm, shall have full power and authority from time to time to visit, repress, redress, record, order, correct, restrain, and amend all such errors, heresies, abuses, offenses, contempts and enormities, whatsoever they be, which by any manner of spiritual authority or jurisdiction ought or may lawfully be reformed, repressed, ordered, redressed, corrected, restrained, or amended, most to the pleasure of Almighty God, the increase of virtue in Christ's religion, and for the conservation of the peace, unity, and tranquility of this realm; any usage, foreign land, foreign authority, prescription, or any other thing or things to the contrary hereof notwithstanding.


The obligations of this act are as follows:


1)   Increase in virtue (anointing) of Christ’s Religion. This means being bound to Christ, the present turning away from the real Christ Jesus of the Reformation being completely and absolutely unconstitutional.


2) Repress and extirpate all errors, heresies, and other enormities and abuses.


3) The Monarch to act in the line of repressing the extremities that are religiously affecting the nation. This is extremely serious in the context of today for we are seeing a complete breakdown of all that is precious to us.


4) To conserve the peace, unity and tranquillity of the realm. Come on! Lets make a stand for we have become a very divided nation with our apparent membership of the E.U. This has brought in Roman Catholics from all over Europe who will vote in a Roman Catholic agenda in our nation which is why the Church of England of which the Monarch is the head on earth must take its stand and take over control of our nation in a Protestant way.


5)  To repress the infiltration of foreign laws and systems into our nation.Roman countries use the principles of Corpus Juris that have their origins in Babylon whereas our Protestant system of Habeas Corpus has its origins in Jerusalem, Greece and Protestant Britain. It is obvious to see that the activities of Rome Henry suppressed are coming back. Rome is taking away our freedoms and so those in Christian Ministry today must demand by quoting this Act of Supremacy that our Monarch repress as she is obligated to do these infiltrations into our society.


After Henry came Queen Mary I, however who repealed the act obviously due to her Roman Catholic convictions but in 1559 Queen Elizabeth I not only brought back into British law the important obligations of the 1534 act, she actually strengthened the whole demand in an action which has become known as the Elizabethan Settlement. How much more therefore should the second Elizabeth make a stand at a time when our whole culture is being undermined?


The Elizabethan Settlement


The first Queen Elizabeth’s act tightened up the constitutional position in many areas including heresy identifying what heresy really is in the political sense, the law being established being within the context of Church and State being together as one. This tightening up involved the taking of an oath which is as follows:


I, A. B., do utterly testify and declare in my conscience that the Queen's Highness is the only supreme governor of this realm, and of all other her Highness's dominions and countries, as well in all spiritual or ecclesiastical things or causes, as temporal, and that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority ecclesiastical or spiritual within thisrealm; and therefore I do utterly renounce and forsake all foreign jurisdictions, powers, superiorities and authorities, and do promise that from henceforth I shall bear faith and true allegiance to the Queen's Highness, her heirs and lawful successors, and to my power shall assist and defend all jurisdictions, pre-eminences, privileges and authorities granted or belonging to the Queen's Highness, her heirs or successors, or united or annexed to the imperial crown of this realm. So help me God, and by the contents of this Book.


The Act itself reads as follows:


An acte restoring to the crown the ancient jurisdiction over the state ecclesiastical and spiritual and abolishing all foreign power repugnant to the same. Most humbly beseech your most excellent majesty your faithful and obedient subjects, the lords spiritual and temporal and the commons in this your present parliament assembled, that, where in time of the reign of your most dear father of worthy memory, King Henry VIII, divers good laws and statutes were made and established, as well for the utter extinguishment and putting away of all usurped and foreign powers and authorities out of this your realm and other your highness's dominions and countries, as also for the restoring and uniting to the imperial crown of this realm the ancient jurisdictions, authorities, superiorities, and pre-eniinences to the same of right belonging and appertaining; by reason whereof we, your most humble and obedient subjects, from the five-and-twentieth year of the reign of your said dear father, were continually kept in good order, and were disburdened of divers great and intolerable charges and exactions before that time unlawfully taken and exacted by such foreign power and authority as before that was usurped, until such time as all the said good laws . . . in the first and second years of the reigns of the late King Philip and Queen Mary . . . were . . repealed . . . ;' by reason of which act of repeal your said humble subjects were eftsoons brought under an usurped foreign power and authority, and vet do remain in that bondage, to the intolerable charges of your loving subjects, if some redress by the authority of this your high court of parliament with the assent of your highness be not had and provided: may it therefore please your highness, for the repressing of the said usurped foreign power and the restoring of the rights jurisdictions, and pre-eminences appertaining to the imperial crown of this your realm, that it may be enacted by the authority of this present parliament that the said act . . . and all and every branch, clauses, and articles therein contained, other than such branches, clauses, and sentences as hereafter shall be excepted, may from the last day of this session of parliament, by authority of this present parliament, be repealed, and shall from thenceforth be utterly void and of none effect . . . And to the intent that all usurped and foreign power and authority, spiritual and temporal, may forever be clearly extinguished and never to be used nor obeyed within this realm or any other your majesty's countries, may it please your highness that it may be further enacted by the authority aforesaid that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state, or potentate, spiritual or temporal, shall at any time after the last day of this session of parliament use, enjoy, or exercise any manner of power, jurisdiction, superiority, authority, pre-eminence, or privilege, spiritual or ecclesiastical, within this realm or within any other your majesty's dominions or countries that now be or hereafter shall be, but from thenceforth the same shall be clearly abolished out of this realm and all other your highness's dominions forever, any statute, ordinance, custom, constitutions, or any other matter or cause whatsoever to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding . . . ; and that your highness, your heirs, and successors, kings or queens of this realm, shall have full power and authority . . . to exercise . . . all manner of jurisdictions, privileges, and preeminences in any wise touching or concerning any spiritual or ecclesiastical jurisdiction within these your realms. . . . And for the better observation and maintenance of this act, may it please your highness that it may be further enacted by the authority aforesaid that all and every Archbishop, Bishop, and all and every other ecclesiastical person and other ecclesiastical officer and minister, of what estate, dignity, pre-eminence, or degree soever he or they be or shall be, and all and every temporal judge, justicer, mayor, and other lay or temporal officer and minister, and every other person having your highness's fee or wages within this realm or any your highness's dominions shall make, take, and receive a corporal oath upon the Evangelist, before such person or persons as shall please your highness, your heirs or successors, under the great seal of England to assign and name to accept and take the same, according to the tenor and effect hereafter following, that is to say- "I, A. B., do utterly testify and declare in my conscience that the queen's highness is the only supreme governor of this realm and of all other her highness's dominions and countries, as well in all spiritual or ecclesiastical things or causes as temporal, and that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state, or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence, or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm; and therefore I do utterly renounce and forsake all foreign jurisdictions, powers, superiorities, and authorities, and do promise that from henceforth I shall bear faith and true allegiance to the queen's highness, her heirs, and lawful successors, and to my power shall assist and defend all jurisdictions, pre-eminences, privileges, and authorities granted or belonging to the queen's highness, her heirs, and successors, or united or annexed to the imperial crown of this realm: so help me God and by the contents of this Book." . . . And for the more sure observation of this act and the utter extinguishment of all foreign and usurped power and authority, may it please your highness that it may be further enacted by the authority aforesaid that, if any person or persons dwelling or inhabiting within this your realm or in any other your highness's realms or dominions . . . , shall by writing, printing, teaching, preaching, express words, deeds, or act, advisedly, maliciously, and directly affirm, hold, stand with, set forth, maintain, or defend the authority, preeminence, power, or jurisdiction, spiritual or ecclesiastical, of any foreign prince, prelate, person, state, or potentate whatsoever, heretofore claimed, used, or usurped within this realm or any dominion or country being within or under the power, dominion, or obeisance of your highness, or shall advisedly, maliciously, or directly put in ure or execute anything for the extolling, advancement, setting forth, maintenance, or defence of any such pretended or usurped jurisdiction, power, pre-eminence, or authority, or any part thereof, that then every such person and persons so doing and offending, their abettors, aiders, procurers, and counsellors, being thereof lawfully convicted and attainted according to the due order and course of the common laws of this realm [shall suffer specified penalties, culminating in punishment for high treason on the third offence] .


. . .Provided always, and be it enacted by the authority aforesaid, that such person or persons to whom your highness, your heirs, or successors, shall hereafter by letters patents under the great seal of England give authority to have or execute any jurisdiction, power, or authority spiritual, or to visit, reform, order, or correct any errors, heresies, schisms, abuses, or enormities by virtue of this act, shall not in any wise have authority or power to order, determine, or adjudge any matter or cause to be heresy but only such as heretofore have been determined, ordered, or adjudged to be heresy by the authority of the canonical Scriptures, or by the first four general councils or any of them, or any other general council wherein the same was declared heresy by the express and plain words of the said canonical Scriptures, or such as hereafter shall be ordered, judged, or determined to be heresy by the high court of parliament of this realm, with the assent of the clergy in their convocation - anything in this act contained to the contrary notwithstanding...


The position therefore for British citizens is as follows, remembering that these acts are just as much law today as they were then, whatever treaties with the European system may say, any attempt to undermine this act being clearly an action of high treason.

This also relates into judgments today that one can claiom as we do claim that judgments that relates to laws of foreign powers have no place in British law and can be ignored.


FIRST: The Oath


*  The Monarch is the “only Supreme Governor” – not the elected Parliament, not the Prime Minister, not the Welsh Assembly or Scottish and Northern Ireland Parliaments but the Monarch. Certainly nor Brussels and the European Union! It is her responsibility.


*  The demand includes spiritual and ecclesiatical things thus making our society a spiritual one and not the secular mish mash of philosophy and false religion it has become!


*  All foreign infiltrators like those of the E.U. and religious infiltrators like those of Rome are outlawed from our British society!


*  The Oath places an obligation on all people who live here to honour our British Protestant Constitutional acts – or within today’s context – LEAVE!

Queen Elizabeth I seems to have been very strict her application of law and this obligation is upon the Judges, Barristers and Protestant Ministers of the Realm to uphold this Elizabethan command.!


SECOND: The Act itself that includes the Oath


*  The Act restores the ancient jurisdiction of the Crown over the State in both ecclesiastical and spiritual matters.


*  The abolition of all foreign interference in our affairs, this abolition being absolutely flouted by E.U. infiltration.


*  Complete restoration of Henry VIII original Act of Supremacy.


*  Mention is given of the unlawful act repealing the 1534 act, all today’s attempts are therefore equally unlawful.


*  The bowing down to foreign power in the act is referred to as “bondage.”


*  In the act foreign infiltration is forever extinguished making it unconstitutional to place the country’s affairs under foreign laws and regimes.




*  Following people particularly called to keep the terms of the oath: Archbishops, Bishops, all ecclesiastical persons, temporal judges, justicers, mayors. These persons are all required to keep the terms of the oath meaning it is compulsory today for all these persons to recognize the Monarch as “Supreme Governor” on condition of course that the Monarch has kept the terms of the Act herself, to ensure our society is a spiritual one and not a secular one, to see that there is no foreign infiltration in our society’s laws etc., and to ensure that our Protestant constitutional acts are kept to.


*  The Act places obligation to see that all those offending the act be brought to justice.


*  The act establishes it to be illegal to tamper with the canon of scripture and this clearly includes the Roman so called “new translations” that are proven to be a heretical offence to our Protestant nation.


These two acts of Supremacy, both of which are on the statute book due to the passion of Queen Elizabeth I must be adhered to and it is our legal and moral duty as Protestants to ensure that due reverence is given to the demands of these acts, even though at the time Puritans were demanding the end of Bishops seeing the Church as the Royal Priesthood but this Puritan demand can be embraced with the security to our nation that that Acts of Supremacy bring.


H.M. Queen Elizabeth I: How we are to respect and honour that which this precious lady achieved. She has left us a fine example as to how we are to behave.


The second Queen Elizabeth has by law to act in line with the first Elizabeth, it now being the time to demand this adherence withdrawing our nation from the clutches of foreign power. This is firmly established also by our Queen’s Oath in her Coronation in 1953. The first Queen Elizabeth is pictured here. 

II  Act Establishing the Coronation Oath 1689


Whereas by the law and ancient usage of this Realm, the Kings and Queens thereof have taken a solemn oath upon the Evangelists at their respective coronations, to maintain the statutes, laws, and customs of the said Realm, and all the people and inhabitants thereof, in their spiritual and civil rights and properties: but forasmuch as the oath itself on such occasion administered, hath heretofore been framed in doubtful words and expressions, with relation to ancient laws and constitutions at this time unknown: to the end therefore that one uniform oath may be in all times to come taken by the Kings and Queens of this Realm, and to them respectively administered at the times of their and every of their coronation: may it please your Majesties that it may be enacted: II.


And be it enacted by the King's and Queen's most excellent majesties, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and the Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, That the oath herein mentioned, and hereafter expressed, shall and may be administered to their most excellent majesties King William and Queen Mary (whom God long preserve) at the time of their coronation, in the presence of all persons that shall be then and there present at the solemnizing thereof, by the Archbishop of Canterbury, or the Archbishop of York, or either of them, or any other bishop of this Realm, whom the King's majesty shall thereunto appoint, and who shall be hereby thereunto respectively authorized; which oath followeth, and shall be administered in this manner; that is to say, III. The archbishop of bishop shall say, "Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the people of this Kingdom of England, and the dominions thereto belonging, according to the statutes in Parliament agreed on, and the laws and customs of the same?"

The King and Queen shall say, "I solemnly promise so to do." 

Archbishop or bishop, "Will you to your power cause law and justice in mercy to be executed in all your judgements?" 
King and Queen, "I will." 

Archbishop or bishop, "Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the laws of God, the true profession of the gospel and the Protestant reformed religion established by law, and will you preserve unto the bishops and clergy of this Realm, and to the churches committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges as by law do or shall appertain unto them, or any of them?" 

King and Queen, "All this I promise to do." 

After this, the King and Queen laying his and her hand upon the holy Gospels, shall say, 
King and Queen, "The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep: So help me God." 

Then the King and Queen shall kiss the book. IV. And be it enacted, That the said oath shall be in like manner administered to every King and Queen, who shall succeed to the imperial crown of this Realm, at their respective coronations, by one of the archbishops or bishops of this Realm of England, for the time being, to be thereunto appointed by such King or Queen respectively, and in the presence of all persons that shall be attending, assisting, or otherwise present at such their respective coronations; any law, statute, or usage to the contrary notwithstanding.


This is the oath of the present Monarch’s Coronation in 1953. It has to be adhered to, there being very serious consequences for anyone who should have persuaded the Monarch to behave in a way contrary to her oath.


Here are the demands of the Oath:


* Maintain the statutes, laws and customs of the realm.


* Government of the People is the Monarch’s responsibility according to the statutes of Parliament and the laws and customs of the same.


* Law and justice in mercy to be executed in all judgements.


* The Laws of God maintained, the Monarch being obligated to do this by the utmost of her power meaning she is honour bound not to allow laws onto the statute book that contravene the Word of God, any such law being null and void according to this constitutional demand.


* The utmost of the Monarch’s power has to be used in relation to the ongoing profession of the Gospel and the Protestant Reformed Religion that has been established by law.


* Rights and privileges are given by law to Bishops and clergy meaning in reality that anyone who tries to quieten the ministry of the Gospel would be in effect guilty of High Treason.


Has our present Monarch and Government kept to the demands of this act? The first Queen Elizabeth most certainly did swearing an oath of allegiance to Christ Jesus saying,


“To no power whatsoever is my crown subject save to that of Christ the King of Kings.”


From this wonderful Protestant base went out missionaries all over the World proclaiming our Constitutional Gospel. We solemnly beseech our present Monarch to not only declare the same proclamation but also re-affirm her own promises before God to maintain to her utmost the laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel. Prophetic Vision No. 24Summer 2002 by David Hathaway, p. 13


I call upon the Monarch to re-affirm her vows as our nation is under great judgment with God calling for repentance in the land, the Monarch being called to declare a time before God of a nation on its knees before Him, and this is not a multi-faith politically correct exercise, it is an activity of heartfelt repentance to the King of Kings Elizabeth I declared she was subject to. Thus saith the Lord.


The Coronation Service of 1953 clearly shows that Great Britain is a Protestant nation, the demands on the Monarch being highly relevant in the call to our nation to come back to its spiritual roots.


Entering the West door of Westminster Abbey Queen Elizabeth II was received by an anthem taken from Psalm 122.


Psalm 122:1-9 (King James Version)

I was glad when they said unto me, Let us go into the house of the LORD.  


Our feet shall stand within thy gates, O Jerusalem.  


Jerusalem is builded as a city that is compact together:  


Whither the tribes go up, the tribes of the LORD, unto the testimony of Israel, to give thanks unto the name of the LORD.  


For there are set thrones of judgment, the thrones of the house of David.  


Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: they shall prosper that love thee.  


Peace be within thy walls, and prosperity within thy palaces.  


For my brethren and companions' sakes, I will now say, Peace be within thee.  


Because of the house of the LORD our God I will seek thy good.


Our nation’s association with the house of David is clearly pulsating out of this Psalm. Our nation built on the Rock of our Lord Jesus Christ, a nation that has gone seriously astray today. Oh! Our hearts peal out to return to this Rock, Jesus Christ being son of David, Matthew 1:1. This is very serious indeed.


I am not portraying the doctrine of British Israelism. What I am portraying is the doctrine of British Christianity that embraces the principles of the whole Bible that are as God blessed Israel when the nation was obedient to His Call - then likewise God will bless Britain to make the nation GREAT AGAIN in HIM on condition we hear and obey whatever He is calling to do. At this time that call to the nation is to repent and get on knees addressing the problems of the nation in HIS STRENGTH - not the intellectualism of man.

Yes, the ceremonial occasion is here but this ceremony has its associations with the Old Testament Kings, the Jerusalem Chamber in the Abbey being used to store all the ceremonial artefacts before the Coronation, these artefacts having been transferred from the Tower of London. This association however is brought together with pagan tradition with the Abbey having a High Altar and a black & white floor as in Masonic Lodges, the Archbishop of Canterbury officiating at the 1953 Coronation being an active freemason.

1953 Coronation

Westminster Abbey checked floor

Masonic Lodge checked floor


Freemasonry looks for God to share an altar with another god, Masonic belief according to Albert Pike portraying a belief that there can be no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness and so we have the concept that one relies on the other, a concept rejected by Holy Scripture which declares there to be only one God, there being no concord between Christ and Baal.


Light and darkness in the Bible are not seen as living alongside each other as we see in the black and white floor! In Britain, however, we have a tension occurring in the National Church symbolised by the black and white floor. Living in the tension of black and white together makes the demand on the Monarch to keep her promises almost impossible to keep, unless she is prepared to declare Jesus as being the only way to God; John 14:6. There is no symbolism of black and white with him!


One has to say that to combine Christianity and Paganism together in a Gnostic cocktail with philosophy is a very dangerous thing to do as is being shown in our nation for we are dealing with a jealous God who demands all our attention. Indeed, at the time of the presentation of the Holy Bible in the Coronation Service the Moderator of the Church of Scotland declared the Bible to be “wisdom, royal law, the lively oracles of God.”  At a time when future Coronation services may look to be more “multi-faith” one has to say that such an occurrence would mark the end of our nation for its whole structure is based on there only being one God who sent his only begotten Son to earth to save us from trespasses and sin. Only his precious blood can redeem man from an eternity in hell.


Hebrews 9:22 (King James Version)


And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.


We bring in therefore the statement of Queen Elizabeth I : “To no power whatsoever is my crown subject save to that of Christ the King of Kings.”  In addition to this we declare the Biblical acclaim of the Puritans of the day accept the Puritans’  to bring about Bishops of a Biblical order rather than the Bishops of Anglican clergy and laymen order.


We need to establish the Royal Priesthood of Believers into the British Church and rid the nations of high altars and symbolised flooring as can be seen in our Cathedrals which should become a mass of rubble with an understanding that the Church itself is the building of God. God has replaced the physical Temple with his living Body on earth and so to have high altars today is an abomination to God.


Hebrews 9:24 (King James Version)

For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us:


1 Corinthians 3:9 (King James Version)

For we are labourers together with God: ye are God's husbandry, ye are God's building.


This comes out in the teaching given in the Coronation service which has reference to Zadok the Priest and Nathan the Prophet who had anointed Solomon king.


Now the sons of Eli were sons of Be-li-al; they knew not the Lord. I Sam. 2:12


the sons of Zadok, that kept the charge of the sanctuary when the children of Israel went astray from me, they shall come near to me to minister unto me; Eze. 44:15


Here we have the distinction between Zadok and Eli with Baal being mentioned in relation to Eli. The Coronation Service however firmly gives reference to Zadok and this is encouraging for this priesthood ministered to the Lord.


The following scripture is referred to in the service:


1 Kings 1:39-40 (King James Version)

And Zadok the priest took an horn of oil out of the tabernacle, and anointed Solomon. And they blew the trumpet; and all the people said, God save king Solomon.  


And all the people came up after him, and the people piped with pipes, and rejoiced with great joy, so that the earth rent with the sound of them.


This reference to Zadok is exciting because it comes at a point in the Service where the Queen was anointed with the oil in the same manner that Zadok anointed King Solomon.


A very significant statement is made:


And as Solomon was anointed King by Zadok the priest and Nathan the prophet, so be thou anointed, blessed, and consecrated Queen over the Peoples, whom the Lord thy God hath given thee to rule and govern. In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.

“So be thou anointed.” This wonderful statement brings about a Monarch who is constitutionally of a priesthood that ministers to the Lord rather than Baal, yet the sons of Eli seem to have taken over the Church in Britain.


Information from The Coronation of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. Approved Souvenir Programme 1953.


The error that seems to have brought about an Eli Priesthood rather than a Zadok one seems to occur at this point in the Coronation Service, The Zadok association in the service is a physical identity rather than a spiritual one remembering that the Old Testament is the physical covenant, the New Testament being the spiritual one.


Our association therefore with Zadok today is a spiritual one and not a physical phenomenon as in the Service. There is therefore no place for a physical altar in this Coronation, this physical altar being a requirement of freemasonry rather than Holy Scripture.


The anointing of the Queen is of spiritual relevance, that association with the crowning of Solomon being highly significant in the spiritual sense rather than physical. This is because we in the Church are the Temples of the Holy Ghost rather than the Masonic attempt to physically associate Solomon’s Temple to a physical God, this god being the “god of this World” identified in II Cor. 4:4.


The “god of this World” that is of the physical entity is Satan, this god bringing about a mishandling of the Word of God to place emphasis on physical significance rather than spiritual. The Biblical significance of black and white is that the light has shined out of the darkness rather than work alongside it which is the significance of the black and white floor in Westminster Abbey, a symbol it shares with Masonic lodges.


2 Corinthians 4:1-10 (King James Version)

Therefore seeing we have this ministry, as we have received mercy, we faint not;  


But have renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not walking in craftiness, nor handling the word of God deceitfully; but by manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God.  


But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost:  


In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.  


For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord; and ourselves your servants for Jesus' sake.  


For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.  


But we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellency of the power may be of God, and not of us.  


We are troubled on every side, yet not distressed; we are perplexed, but not in despair;  


Persecuted, but not forsaken; cast down, but not destroyed;  


Always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body.


We now have the treasure of God in earthen vessels and whilst it can be a great show displaying the Crown Jewels of the nation, these jewels decline into complete insignificance when placed alongside God’s true treasure which is within us.


2 Corinthians 5:1 (King James Version)

For we know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of God, an house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens.


We know from the scripture that the Church is not a holy place made with hands and that we, the Church are the Temple of the Holy Ghost.


Acts 7:48-51 (King James Version)

Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet,  


Heaven is my throne, and earth is my footstool: what house will ye build me? saith the Lord: or what is the place of my rest?  Hath not my hand made all these things?  


Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye.


1 Corinthians 3:16-17 (King James Version)

Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?  


If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.


1 Corinthians 6:19-20 (King James Version)

What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?  


For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.


2 Corinthians 6:16-17 (King James Version)

And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.  


Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.


Ephesians 2:19-22 (King James Version)

 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;  


And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;  


In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:  


In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.


The worship that goes on, therefore, towards a physical altar is clearly one of the god this world – the god of the physical!


To analyse this point therefore we are seeing within this service a combining of physical and spiritual phenomena apparently on the lines of the priesthood of Zadok. In reality this is being combined by the Bishops and Archbishop who was an active freemason before a physical altar, that physical altar holding the spirit of Antichrist, the other Jesus of II Cor. 11:4, God’s instruction being to bear with this nation over this. We bear with the nation by pointing out the heresy the Monarch is oath bound to repress, she having the responsibility to remove the pagan elements of this service and replace them with the non conformist belief our Constitution demands we provide.


The High Altar with its rail that separates laity and priesthood is a actual re-building of the veil that Christ Jesus removed, the separation of man from God.. The “other Jesus” of II Cor. 11:4 looks to control our paths through an order of Priesthood that is miles away from the Order of Melchisedec, the fruit of these paths being the many ungodly laws our Monarch seems to have placed on the statute book, laws that bring death to the unborn child for example rather than life.


2 Corinthians 11:4 (King James Version)

 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.

This high altar in Westminster Abbey  has a “Jesus” with a Sun clearly depicted around Jesus head). This picture does not at all relate to the activity of a Protestant nation, a nation to be free of altars, and so this whole phenomenon does not at all relate to be  part of the “Protestant Reformed Religion established by law” in the Coronation Oath.


The Word of God is clear and we have to come out of this Anglicanism as a nation and give our precious constitutional acts to non-conformist clergy to cherish and look after.  We are to be free of Baal!


2 Corinthians 6:14-18 (King James Version)

Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?  And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?  


And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.  


Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.  


And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.


We are clearly a nation in covenant with God and we have shown that the National Church has not given heed to the separation called upon in our Constitutional acts from Rome and its Antichrist spirits. False altars and idolatry abound and the nation has to repent of such decadence and evil if our nation is to be great again.


 In 1953 a copy of the actual King James Authorised Bible that was given to the Queen at her Coronation was given to members of the armed forces. I hold a precious copy. I pray that the call of God upon Britain will be revealed powerfully to the people restoring our nation back to Him.


III Act of Settlement 1700 following the Bill of Rights 1689


Both acts deal with the succession to the throne, 1689 Bill relating this to the rights of citizens living under a constitutional monarchy. In the U.K. the 1689 bill is accompanied by Magna Carta in relation to how we live in the U.K.


It is so important to maintain these systems of government for this generation and for the future. Magna Carta is particularly related to Great Britain’s legal system of Habeas Corpus, it of course being treasonable to attempt to bring in Europe’s papal system ofCorpus Juris to our nation.


Magna Carta influenced the development of Britain’s common law practice as well as the systems of the countries of the Empire and now the Commonwealth. It also influenced the American Constitution as well bringing us spiritually together as one nation.


The Bill of Rights brought about the following freedoms bringing an element of democracy to a country that was and is fundamentally theocratic:


  • Freedom from royal interference with the law. Though the sovereign remains the fount of justice, he or she cannot unilaterally establish new courts or act as a judge.


  • Freedom from taxation by Royal Prerogative. The agreement of parliament became necessary for the implementation of any new taxes.


  • Freedom to petition the monarch.


  • Freedom from the standing army during a time of peace. The agreement of parliament became necessary before the army could be moved against the populace when not at war.


  • Freedom for Protestants to bear arms for their own defence, as suitable to their class and as allowed by law.


  • Freedom to elect members of parliament without interference from the sovereign.


  • Freedom of speech in parliament. This means that the proceedings of parliament can not be questioned in a court of law or any other body outside of parliament itself; this forms the basis of modern parliamentary privilege.


  • Freedom from cruel and unusual punishment, as well as excessive bail.


  • Freedom from fine and forfeiture without a trial.


  • Also, in a prelude to the Act of Settlement to come twelve years later, the Bill of Rights barred Roman Catholics from the throne of England, as "it hath been found by experience that it is inconsistent with the safety and welfare of this protestant kingdom to be governed by a papist prince"; thus William III and Mary II were named as the successors of James VII and II, and that the throne would pass from them first to Mary's heirs, then to her sister, Princess Anne of Denmark and her heirs, and further to any heirs of William by a later marriage. The monarch was further required to swear acoronation oath to maintain the Protestant religion. The act also required the monarch to summon parliament frequently, a clause that was later reinforced by the Triennial Act, 1694.


Interestingly the act proclaims the Monarch to still be “the fount of justice” which means to me that although in effect the acts gives rights of law making to Parliament, the act most certainly still maintains a demand on the Monarch to ensure those acts stay consistent with the laws of God. It is that demand that needs to be maintained today.


The freedom to petition the Monarch would be much more effective today if Protestants came together around the Protestant Bible of 1611 instead of coming under the “new translations” of Rome. A Protestant Council should be set up petitioning the Monarch to honour the assurances and promises she has given.


The freedom for Protestants to bear arms clearly relates to protection, an important right for those challenging the present day multi-faith, all roads lead to God structure.


The restriction on Roman Catholics taking to the throne is obvious. The same restriction applies to Protestants who apply to be Pope!


Our throne is the worldwide throne of the “Protestant Reformed Religion Established by law”. In fact no Roman Catholic is entitled to be a part of our Protestant Royal Family, this restriction seemingly being ignored by some parts of the family today.

This constitutional restriction is particularly emphasised in the Act of Settlement that follows:

Act of Settlement 1700


Whereas in the first year of the reign of Your Majesty, and of our late most gracious sovereign lady Queen Mary (of blessed memory), an Act of Parliament was made, entitled, "An Act for declaring the rights and liberties of the subject, and for settling the succession of the crown," wherein it was (amongst other things) enacted, established, and declared that the crown and regal government of the Kingdoms of England, France, and Ireland, and the dominions thereunto belonging, should be and continue to Your Majesty and the said late Queen, during the joint lives of Your Majesty and the said Queen, and to the survivor: and that after the decease of Your Majesty and of the said Queen, the said Crown and regal government should be and remain to the heirs of the body of the said late Queen; and for default of such issue, to Her Royal Highness the Princess Anne of Denmark, and the heirs of her body; and for default of such issue to the heirs of the body of Your Majesty.


And it was thereby further enacted, that all and every person and persons that then were, or afterwards should be reconciled to, or shall hold communion with the see or Church of Rome, or should profess the popish religion, or marry a papist, should be excluded, and are by that Act made for ever incapable to inherit, possess, or enjoy the Crown and government of this realm, and Ireland, and the dominions thereunto belonging, or any part of the same, or to have, use, or exercise any regal power, authority, or jurisdiction within the same: and in all and every such case and cases the people of these realms shall be and are thereby absolved of their allegiance: and that the said Crown and government shall from time to time descend to and be enjoyed by such person or persons, being Protestants, as should have inherited and enjoyed the same, in case the said person or persons, so reconciled, holding communion, professing or marrying, as aforesaid, were naturally dead.


The understanding I have here that not only does this act prohibit the Monarchy from professing the popish religion or marrying a papist this prohibition also relates to all those in the government in the realm!


After the making of which statute, and the settlement therein contained, your majesty's good subjects, who were restored to the full and free possession and enjoyment of their religion, rights, and liberties, by the providence of God giving success to your majesty's just undertakings and unwearied endeavours for that purpose, had no greater temporal felicity to hope or wish for, that to see a royal progeny descending from Your Majesty, to whom (under God) they owe their tranquillity, and whose ancestors have for many years been principal assertors of the reformed religion and the liberties of Europe, and from our said most gracious sovereign lady, whose memory will always be precious to the subjects of these realms: and it having since pleased Almighty God to take away our said sovereign Lady, and also the most hopeful Prince William, Duke of Gloucester (the only surviving issue of Her Royal Highness the Princess Anne of Denmark) to the unspeakable grief and sorrow of Your Majesty and your said good subjects, who under such losses being sensibly put in mind, that it standeth wholly in the pleasure of Almighty God to prolong the lives of Your Majesty and of Her Royal Highness, and to grant to Your Majesty, or to Her Royal Highness, such issue as may be inheritable to the Crown and regal government aforesaid, by the respective limitations in the said recited act contained, do constantly implore the divine mercy for those blessings: and Your Majesty's said subjects having daily experience of your royal care and concern for the present and future welfare of these Kingdoms, and particularly recommending from your throne a further provision to be made for the succession of the Crown in the Protestant line, for the happiness of the nation, and the security of our religion; and it being absolutely necessary for the safety, peace, and quiet of this realm, to obviate all doubts and contentions in the same, by reason of any pretended title to the Crown, and to maintain a certainty in the succession thereof, to which your subjects may safely have recourse for their protection, in case the limitations in the said recited act should determine.


Therefore for a further provision of the succession of the Crown in the Protestant line, we Your Majesty's most dutiful and loyal subjects, the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, do beseech Your Majesty that it may be enacted and declared, and be it enacted and declared by the King's most excellent majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, That the most excellent Princess Sophia, Electress and Duchess Dowager of Hanover, daughter of the most excellent Princess Elizabeth, late Queen of Bohemia, daughter of our late sovereign lord King James the First, of happy memory, be and is hereby declared to be the next in succession, in the Protestant line, to the imperial Crown and dignity of the said Realms of England, France, and Ireland, with the dominions and territories thereunto belonging, after His Majesty, and the Princess Anne of Denmark, and in default of issue of the said Princess Anne, and of His Majesty respectively: and that from and after the deceases of His said Majesty, our now sovereign lord, and of Her Royal Highness the Princess Anne of Denmark, and for default of issue of the said Princess Anne, and of His Majesty respectively, the Crown and regal government of the said Kingdoms of England, France, and Ireland, and of the dominions thereunto belonging, with the royal state and dignity of the said Realms, and all honours, styles, titles, regalities, prerogatives, powers, jurisdictions and authorities, to the same belonging and appertaining, shall be, remain, and continue to the said most excellent Princess Sophia, and the heirs of her body, being Protestants: and thereunto the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, shall and will in the name of all the people of this Realm, most humbly and faithfully submit themselves, their heirs and posterities: and do faithfully promise, that after the deceases of His Majesty, and Her Royal Highness, and the failure of the heirs of their respective bodies, to stand to, maintain, and defend the said Princess Sophia, and the heirs of her body, being Protestants, according to the limitation and succession of the Crown in this act specified and contained, to the utmost of their powers, with their lives and estates, against all persons whatsoever that shall attempt anything to the contrary.


II. Provided always, and be it hereby enacted, that all and every person and persons, who shall or may take or inherit the said Crown, by virtue of the limitation of this present act, and is, are or shall be reconciled to, or shall hold communion with, the See or Church of Rome, or shall profess the popish religion, or shall marry a papist, shall be subject to such incapacities, as in such case or cases are by the said recited act provided, enacted, and established; and that every King and Queen of this Realm, who shall come to and succeed in the imperial Crown of this Kingdom, by virtue of this act, shall have the coronation oath administered to him, her or them, at their respective coronations, according to the act of Parliament made in the first year of the reign of His Majesty, and the said late Queen Mary, intituled, An act for establishing the coronation oath, and shall make, subscribe, and repeat the declaration in the act first above recited mentioned or referred to, in the manner and form thereby prescribed.


III. And whereas it is requisite and necessary that some further provision be made for securing our religion, laws and liberties, from and after the death of His Majesty and the Princess Anne of Denmark, and in default of issue of the body of the said Princess, and of His Majesty respectively; be it enacted by the King's most excellent majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, That whosoever shall hereafter come to the possession of this Crown, shall join in communion with the Church of England, as by law established;


That in case the Crown and imperial dignity of this Realm shall hereafter come to any person, not being a native of this Kingdom of England, this nation be not obliged to engage in any war for the defence of any dominions or territories which do not belong to the Crown of England, without the consent of Parliament;


That no person who shall hereafter come to the possession of this Crown, shall go out of the dominions of England, Scotland, or Ireland, without the consent of Parliament;

That from and after the time that the further limitation by this act shall take effect, all matters and things relating to the well governing of this Kingdom, which are properly cognizable in the Privy Council by the laws and customs of this Realm, shall be translated there, and all resolutions taken thereupon shall be signed by such of the Privy Council as shall advise and consent to the same;


That after the said limitation shall take effect as aforesaid, no person born out of the Kingdoms of England, Scotland, or Ireland, or the dominions thereunto belonging (although he be naturalized or made a denizen, except such as are born of English parents) shall be capable to be of the Privy Council, or a member of either House of Parliament, or to enjoy any office or place of trust, either civil or military, or to have any grant of lands, tenements or hereditaments from the Crown, to himself or to any other or others in trust for him;


That no person who has an office or place of profit under the King, or receives a pension from the Crown, shall be capable of serving as a member of the House of Commons;

That after the said limitation shall take effect as aforesaid, judges commissions be made quamdiu se bene gesserint, and their salaries ascertained and established; but upon the address of both Houses of Parliament it may be lawful to remove them;


That no pardon under the Great Seal of England be pleadable to an impeachment by the Commons in Parliament.


IV. And whereas the laws of England are the birth-right of the people thereof, and all the Kings and Queens, who shall ascend the throne of this Realm, ought to administer the government of the same according to the said laws, and all their officers and ministers ought to serve them respectively according to the same: the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, do therefore further humbly pray, That all the laws and statutes of this Realm for securing the established religion, and the rights and liberties of the people thereof, and all other laws and statutes of the same now in force, may be ratified and confirmed, and the same are by His Majesty, by and with the advice of the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, and by authority of the same, ratified and confirmed accordingly.


This in real terms is what the Act brings to us all:


  • The monarch "shall join in communion with the Church of England." This was another provision to avoid a Roman Catholic monarch. Along with James II's perceived despotism, his religion was the main cause of the Glorious Revolution of 1688, and the previous linked religious and succession problems solved by the joint monarchy ofWilliam and Mary.


  • If a person not native to England comes to the throne, England will not wage war for "any dominions or territories which do not belong to the Crown of England, without the consent of Parliament." This was farsighted, because when the House of Hanoverascended the British throne they would retain the territories that became the Kingdom of Hanover (situated in modern-day Germany's Lower Saxony). This provision has been dormant since Queen Victoria ascended the throne, because she did not inherit Hanover under the Salic Laws of the German states of the day, but in principle it could again become relevant in the future.


  • No monarch may leave "the dominions of England, Scotland, or Ireland," without the consent of Parliament. This provision was repealed in 1716, at the request of George I, who was also the Elector of Hanover and Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg of the Holy Roman Empire, and so frequently needed and wanted to stay in Hanover.


  • All government matters within the jurisdiction of the Privy Council were to be transacted there, and all council resolutions were to be signed by those who advised and consented to them. This was because parliament wanted to know who was deciding policies, as sometimes councillors' signatures normally attached to resolutions were absent. This provision was repealed early in Queen Anne's reign, as many councillors ceased to offer advice and some stopped attending meetings altogether.


  • No foreigner, even if naturalized (unless they were born of English parents), shall be allowed to be a Privy Councillor or a member of either House of Parliament, or hold "any office or place of trust, either civil or military, or to have any grant of lands, tenements or hereditaments from the Crown, to himself or to any other or others in trust for him." As a result of subsequent nationality laws, this provision does not apply to naturalized citizens in any country.


  • No person who has an office under the monarch, or receives a pension from the Crown, can be Member of Parliament (MP). This provision was inserted to avoid unwelcome royal influence over the House of Commons. It remains in force, but with several exceptions. As a side effect, this provision means that MPs seeking to resign from parliament could get around the age-old prohibition on resignation by obtaining a low-salary sinecure in the pay of the Crown; while several offices have been used for this purpose, the main one in current use is the Wardenship of the Chiltern Hundreds.


  • Judges' commissions are valid quamdiu se bene gesserint (during good behaviour), and if they do not behave themselves they can be removed only by both houses of parliament, or the one house of parliament, depending on the legislature's structure. This provision was the result of various monarchs' influencing judges' rulings, and it assured nearly full judicial independence.


  • No pardon by the monarch can save someone from being impeached by the House of Commons.


 4 Text of the Act of Settlement  


5    I. Naamani Tarkow, 'The Significance of the Act of Settlement in the Evolution of English Democracy', Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 4. (Dec., 1943), p. 547.


The Monarch is joined together with the Church of England but this was stated under the understanding that the Church of England was not in league with Rome. 

Part 2:  Great Britain’s Acts of

Union and the Mayflower Compact

The Union with Wales                                

Defeated symbol                                         

Statute of Rhuddlan                                   

The Laws in Wales Acts                             

The Union with Scotland 1707                  

John Knox                                                    

Act of Union with Ireland 1800                

Patrick – not a Roman Catholic!              

Patrick’s Confession proves the point!    


Spiritual Heritage of

All Ireland is Protestant!                            

Exposure of the Antichrist                        

The Mayflower Compact                            


Great Britain’s Acts of Union and the Mayflower Compact


Wales is a very sad country today for its place in the United Kingdom has been undermined by the flag of St. David not being included in the Union Jack. Instead Wales chooses a flag of a defeated dragon, a dragon symbolising a Druidic past rather than its great Christian revivals of the 1700’s and early twentieth century.


Revivalist Evan Roberts thought it strange that a country with a Christian heritage should have as its symbol a dragon that the Bible declares to be Satan. It is time to bring life back to Wales, a nation famous for its missionaries going all over the World as a result of great revivals.


Revelation 12:9 (King James Version)

And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

As I was burdened for Wales and prayed for the success of the kingdom of God and battled against the forces of darkness I was burdened by the necessity of removing the dragon from being the emblem of our country. As the religion of Wales is based on the Holy Scriptures and because the red dragon in the scriptures is a symbol of the devil is it not scriptural to remove it? When the devil sees his symbol on the flag of a Christian country that professes to hate him it is a source of joy to him. Is there not a cry in the hearts of thousands of followers of the Lamb in Wales against this inconsistency between theirprofession and their emblem?


1905 Revivalist Evan Roberts


To be a full member of a Protestant United Kingdom Wales must put aside its pagan emblem and take an enthusiastic role in the United Kingdom Protestant nation moving away from its reliance on Brussels in its new founded Assembly and coming back to playing a full part in the United Kingdom Parliament.

The alliance with England began in 1284 with the Statute of Rhuddlan which placed lands in Wales under the control of what would be the British Crown. Rhuddlan Castle from where this proclamation was given was one of a ring of castles built by Edward I to suppress Welsh objection to the activity.


The Laws in Wales Acts 1535-1542 went further than the 1284 statute in that they brought the legal systems of Wales in line with that of England, the single jurisdiction being called the legal system of England and Wales.


The two main acts passed were those of 1536 and 1543 under Henry VIII who was part of the Welsh Tudor Dynasty. The effects of the acts were as follows:


  • the marcher lordships were abolished as political units and five new counties (Monmouthshire, Brecknockshire, Radnorshire, Montgomeryshire and Denbighshire) were established, thus creating a Wales of 13 counties;


  • other areas of the lordships were annexed to Shropshire, Herefordshire,Gloucestershire, Glamorgan, Carmarthenshire, Pembrokeshire, Cardiganshire and Merionethshire


  • the borders of Wales were established and have remained the same since; this was unintentional as Wales was to be incorporated fully into England, but the status ofMonmouthshire was still ambiguous until 1974;


  • the courts of the marcher lordships lost the power to try serious criminal cases;


  • the office of Justice of the Peace was introduced;


  • Wales elected members to the English (Westminster) Parliament;


  • the Council of Wales and the Marches was established on a legal basis;


  • the Court of Great Sessions were established, a system peculiar to Wales;


  • a Sheriff was appointed in every county, and other county officers as in England.


The result of this was that Wales fully became part of the British Protestant Constitutional heritage, Wales’s apparent semi independence today placing its people under the bondage of the Treaty of Rome rather than the freedom of Great Britain’s constitutional acts.


The Union with Scotland 1707


Scotland with its Protestant heritage joined the Union in 1707 with a huge advantage over Wales in that it was able to bring into the Union a National Protestant Church that had not come under the curse of a separate priesthood to laity. This Church had not come under a Roman obsession with high altars and so coming into this Union was a fully reformed Church based on the Puritanism John Knox had brought to Scotland.


Doctrine, worship and government of the Roman Church had been overthrown by the Scottish Parliament in 1560 with Protestantism being established as the national religion. John Knox became the Minister of St. Giles, Edinburgh formulating a confession of faith and constitution of the new National Church which was to be governed on Presbyterian lines rather than Episcopalian. One major aspect of this confession was that priests were replaced by ministers with a Kirk Session running local churches.


Knox was a fine example of how a Protestant Reformer is to behave in his admonishing of Queen Mary Queen of Scots for her Catholic sympathies and this is what is required today in a Britain where those same Catholic heresies are infiltrating our society. There is a need for reformers to repress these attacks against our Protestant heritage, our present Monarch being obligated by law to reject such Roman infiltration.


John Knox was described as “The Thundering Scot” and how we need his thunder today. He declared, “Give me Scotland, or I die” and it is this passion that needs to be restored to Scotland. Away with its Catholic controlled Brussels Parliament! This is not independence; this is control and decadence that Knox stood against. It is not the answer of Scottish Nationalism, the Scottish Nationalists today being more under the control of the E.U. than Westminster could have ever dreamt of! Knox, however, was a true nationalist who sought to place his nation under God, not the Papal regime of the Brussels Parliament the Scots in their present day Parliament have bowed down to.


I know he would have approved of the Union with England, not as an inferior partner but as an equal one under God. In fact I believe the Scots deserve a superior role for their National Church for Knox had fully reformed Scotland's Church from Rome. Today many of the Union’s problems stem from the fact that the Church of England has hung onto their system of priests and laity that the Scots have rejected. Being in favour of the Union does not mean that one sees Scotland as inferior; indeed a true Nationalist would see opportunity to develop its Scottish nationalistic Protestantism in a way that would benefit the whole of the union.


The 1707 Act of Union contained twenty five articles, the Church of Scotland that had been founded by Knox being protected by a separate act that secured the Presbyterian establishment of the Church. From the very outset of this Union Scotland’s identity was protected and so we can have a unity of the Scots, English, Welsh and Irish, that unity being to Christ Jesus first for these acts of Union were drawing our nations spiritually together in a covenant, a covenant that can never be broken.


As a result of the two acts peers were sent from Scotland to sit in the House of Lords with Scots law remaining with the same force as before. The Act of Settlement was fully embraced with Roman Catholics being banned from the throne. The bringing together of the Act of Settlement with a nation that had a national Church free of separate Priests and High Altars is a dynamic that God is longing to develop in the whole of the United Kingdom. Scotland's government as brought together by John Knox is the way God has ordained the national churches of England, Ireland and Wales to be as well as Scotland. The present moving away from this ideal by the Church of Scotland is one of treachery and despair for the people of Scotland. The landmark of Knox needs to be fully embraced again by Scottish Government within the Union.


The overiding constitutional principle which is still within our constitutional acts of laws and statutes is that all laws passed within each and every Parliament or assembly of bthe Union must be in line with our Christian Protestant Constitutional Acts. Any Act that is contrary to these overiding Acts is null and void.  


This is a vital point that I intend to take  further challenging all ungodly acts of the Union nations, challenging how acts of filth, murder and decadence can possibly be legal in a nation that has a Monarch who has promised to keep the laws of God.


Truly we a have a very powerful Protestant Union together, it now being for the Church of England to take the Scottish example and fully reform its Roman influenced National Church.


Act of Union with Ireland 1800


Ireland with its great spiritual heritage was joined to the United Kingdom by two acts in 1800 known as the Union with Ireland Act and the Act of Union with Ireland Act.


Ireland is a vibrant spiritual country with a Christian heritage going back to Patrick who was an excellent Apostle. He was not a Catholic as many suppose but was a true Apostle establishing sound doctrine very different to that of the Catholic order that was to follow.


Henry C. Vedder wrote: "Rome's most audacious theft was when she seized bodily the Apostle Peter and made him the putative head and founder of her system; but next to that brazen act stands her effrontery when she 'annexed' the great missionary preacher of Ireland and enrolled him among her saints"


It is generally recognized that Patrick dates back to 360 to 387 A.D., his home country being Scotland. It is obvious to anyone studying the history of Patrick that he was not a Roman Catholic, this operation of Antichrist being only in its infancy at the time with the Papal authority not being known about in Ireland. Patrick was of Apostolic tradition, there being no mention in literature that he had been sent from Rome.


Ireland, therefore does not have a Catholic heritage but a heritage of Protestant doctrine with Patrick fully immersing born again believers in water. Patrick refers to having baptised many thousand men, not infants but men referring to these adults as "baptized captives", "baptized handmaidens of Christ", "baptized women distributed as rewards",  and "baptized believers".


Oh! how I cry for what is known as the Irish Republic to come back into this precious Union with Britain, not as suppressed colonials but as equal partners before God with a heritage more akin to Protestant belief than Catholic. It is clear that Patrick believed in the substitutionary atonement of Christ, salvation not coming through catechism, communion, confession or chanting, this being clear in his testimony of how he became a Christian.William Cathcart wrote, "There is no ground for doubting but that he preached the gospel of repentance and faith in Ireland, and that his ministrations were attended by overwhelming success" (The Baptist Encyclopedia, page 887).


I believe God is calling us to bring Ireland into its true heritage away from the bastion of religion, into the freedom Patrick embraced. I can absolutely prove that Patrick’s doctrine was not Catholic and cry out to those in the Catholic South to come on board what Patrick embraced.


This statement from Patrick’s Confession is Protestant belief, not Catholic.


I, Patrick, a sinner, a most simple countryman, the least of all the faithful and most contemptible to many, had for father the deacon Calpurnius, son of the late Potitus, a presbyter, of the settlement of Bannaven Taburniae; he had a small villa nearby where I was taken captive. I was at that time about sixteen years of age. I did not, indeed, know the true God; and I was taken into captivity in Ireland with many thousands of people, according to our deserts, for quite drawn away from God, we did not keep his precepts, nor were we obedient to our presbyters who used to remind us of our salvation. And the Lord brought down on us the fury of his being and scattered us among many nations, even to the ends of the earth, where I, in my smallness, am now to be found among foreigners. 

And there the Lord opened my mind to an awareness of my unbelief, in order that, even so late, I might remember my transgressions and turn with all my heart to the Lord my God, who had regard for my insignificance and pitied my youth and ignorance. And he watched over me before I knew him, and before I learned sense or even distinguished between good and evil, and he protected me, and consoled me as a father would his son. 

Therefore, indeed, I cannot keep silent, nor would it be proper, so many favours and graces has the Lord deigned to bestow on me in the land of my captivity. For after chastisement from God, and recognizing him, our way to repay him is to exalt him and confess his wonders before every nation under heaven.

For there is no other God, nor ever was before, nor shall be hereafter, but God the Father, unbegotten and without beginning, in whom all things began, whose are all things, as we have been taught; and his son Jesus Christ, who manifestly always existed with the Father, before the beginning of time in the spirit with the Father, indescribably begotten before all things, and all things visible and invisible were made by him. He was made man, conquered death and was received into Heaven, to the Father who gave him all power over every name in Heaven and on Earth and in Hell, so that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord and God, in whom we believe. And we look to his imminent coming again, the judge of the living and the dead, who will render to each according to his deeds. And he poured out his Holy Spirit on us in abundance, the gift and pledge of immortality, which makes the believers and the obedient into sons of God and co-heirs of Christ who is revealed, and we worship one God in the Trinity of holy name."


To summarise this part of his confession, Patrick clearly says;

*  He was a sinner called upon by God, a sinner who confessed his transgressions and obeyed God’s call.


*  He believed in the co-existent, co-equal Godhead denied in Catholic Bibles and embraced in the Protestant King James Version. Patrick is in agreement with the Protestant Bible on a key doctrinal point – the Catholic Bibles are way off in Alexandrian heresy.


Philippians 2:6 (King James Version)

Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:


CATHOLIC BIBLE NIV taken from Codices Vaticanus and Sinaticus


Phil 2:  6 Who, being in very nature God, 
      did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,



Phil. 2:6 Who, being in the form of God, did not count equality withGod something to be grasped.


In addition to this doctrinal point, Patrick was emphatic in his Trinitarian doctrine holding up a shamrock and asking if it is one leaf or three.

“It is both one leaf and three” came the reply. “So it is with God” declared Patrick. This truth, however, is missing from Catholic Bibles and is embraced in the Protestant KJV making Patrick’s belief completely at odds with Catholic doctrine today.


I appeal to the people of the South to come on board the boat of real Christianity, not religious bigotry which you may have witnessed but the same liberating reformation that freed up other nations of the United Kingdom before bowing to the Roman E.U.


This liberation can be open to all the people of Ireland, not to come under the English but be as equal partners before God in Britain God longs to call “Great”. Patrick’s doctrine of the Trinity is not in Catholic Bibles and so I ask the people of the South to choose which doctrine is yours, Patrick’s or Catholic Bibles?


1 John 5:7 (King James Version)

For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.





 The spiritual heritage of all Ireland therefore is Protestant, its place being in a Protestant Union under God. Indeed each house of the Parliament of Ireland in 1707 passed an address that would be given to Queen Anne saying; "May God put it in your royal heart to add greater strength and lustre to your crown, by a still more comprehensive Union"


The British Government did not respond to this however and it was not until 1800 that an act was passed unifying the countries both in Britain and Ireland. 90% of Ireland’s population at that time however was not Protestant, with the majority religion being Roman Catholic, despite of that religion’s inconsistency with the fundamental doctrines of Patrick. The Irish Parliament who made the request to Queen Anne was seen as a Protestant one, the Parliament being  known as “The Protestant Ascendancy” with Catholics not being allowed to vote until the 1790’s.


It would seem that Great Britain had encouraged union in 1800 so as to bring stability after the Irish Rebellion of 1798. It would seem that certain Catholics believed that they could join the French in a Catholic Union for their revolution had been in 1789.


The articles of the Acts passed in both Britain and Ireland are as follows:


  • Articles I–IV dealt with the political aspects of the Union which included Ireland having over 100 MPs representing it in the united parliament, meeting in the Palace of Westminster. Ireland gained 100 seats in the House of Commons and 32 seats in theHouse of Lords: 28 representative peers elected for life, and four clergymen of the (Anglican) Church of Ireland, chosen for each session.


  • Article V created a united Protestant church, the United Church of England and Ireland, but confirmed the independence of the Church of Scotland.


  • Article VI created a customs union, with the exception that customs duties on certain British and Irish goods passing between the two countries would remain for 10 years (a consequence of having trade depressed by the ongoing war with revolutionary France).


  • Article VII stated that Ireland would have to contribute two-seventeenths towards the expenditure of the United Kingdom. The figure was a ratio of Irish to British foreign trade.


  • Article VIII formalised the legal and judicial aspects of the Union.


In the following century came the establishment of what was knows as the Irish Free State that in effect removed ties with Great Britain, Northern Ireland remaining a part of the Union. Its Parliament first  met in 1921 in Belfast City Hall with King George V calling for reconciliation between the largely Catholic South and the largely Protestant North.


Northern Ireland has operated since 1921 as a distinct country within the United Kingdom, having its own Parliament for 50 years until it was suspended in 1972. Currently there is a Northern Ireland Assembly and Executive, an operation restored in 2007. This marked what many saw as the end of “the troubles”, Protestants being the majority in this part of Ireland and Catholics a large minority.


Over the years Northern Ireland Protestants have shown themselves to be passionately behind the Great British Protestant cause, often times seemingly the only political and religious voice exposing the infiltration of Catholicism into our Protestant society.


Unashamedly Dr Ian Paisley has stood emphatically behind the Protestant cause clearly identifying the Antichrist structures of Catholicism even to the point as addressing the Pope as being of that order.


I denounce you, Anti-Christ!

I refuse you as Christ's enemy and Antichrist with all your false doctrine.
Ian Paisley
Addressed at Pope John Paul II on a visit to the European Parliament October 1988.


Whilst it is important to get on well with all parts of society discouraging violence whenever we can, it is also important that we as a nation recognise our heritage as Dr, Paisley has done both in the world of religion and politics. He has stood against the infiltration of immorality in our society with his Save Ulster from Sodomy Campaign in 1977. He also stood against the Sexual Offences Act of 1967 which apparently decriminalised homosexuality although the higher laws of our Constitutional Acts forbid such a decriminalisation. His Party the D.U.P. was the only main political party in the U.K. to campaign against the National Lottery in 1994, the Northern Ireland M.P.’s very often being the main body of traditional Protestantism in the House of Commons in modern times.


The whole of Ireland once both nations have realised their united heritage of Patrick has a real place in the United Kingdom. Ireland can be a Protestant nation under God again, a great nation, the Great British Protestant Nation of England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland, being one nation with four individual personalities operating as one country.


The Mayflower Compact


Under the calling of Almighty God Pilgrims crossed the Atlantic in 1620 with our Protestant heritage to bring about a nation that would for all time be in covenant with us under God. This nation was to become the United States of America and this covenant that was established those years ago has united our countries under God in times of trouble.


Britain and America today are moving away from God, passing ungodly laws and promoting all kinds of filth and decadence displeasing to God and so it is vital that we come around this covenant again, both Great Britain and America to say “Lord, we beseech thee to forgive our foolish ways and restore us to the ways of thy Authorised Bible the book the Pilgrim Fathers brought to the land of America.”


“James, by the Grace of God, King of England, Scotland, France and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, …. Whereas, upon the humble petition .. of our well disposed subjects, that intended to make several Plantations in the Parts of America hope thereby to advance the enlargement of Christian Religion, to the Glory of God Almighty” .. The New England Charter of 1620: King James I

"In the name of God, Amen. We, whose names are underwritten, the Loyal Subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord, King James, by the Grace of God, of England, France and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, e&. Having undertaken for the Glory of God, and Advancement of the Christian Faith, and the Honour of our King and Country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the northern parts of Virginia; do by these presents, solemnly and mutually in the Presence of God and one of another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil Body Politick, for our better Ordering and Preservation, and Furtherance of the Ends aforesaid; And by Virtue hereof to enact, constitute, and frame, such just and equal Laws, Ordinances, Acts, Constitutions and Offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the General good of the Colony; unto which we promise all due submission and obedience. In Witness whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names at Cape Cod the eleventh of November, in the Reign of our Sovereign Lord, King James of England, France and Ireland, the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty-fourth. Anno Domini, 1620."


Like Britain America has a landmark of Protestant heritage to be embraced. Edward Burke (1729-1794) declared in the British Parliament that "There is but one law for all, namely, that law which governs all law, the law of our Creator." This statement which refers to Britain and its colonies including America declares that there is but one law, the law that governs all laws. This statement is a timely reminder to governments in Britain and America to understand the necessity of keeping law in line with our Protestant constitutional acts, a demand so great in this time of great judgment in the World.


Patrick Henry (1736-1799), five-time Governor of Virginia, whose "Give me liberty or give me death" speech has made him immortal, said: "It cannot be emphasized too strongly, nor too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Referring to the Pilgrim Fathers from England who founded the great nation of America, Henry clearly recognises what all this is all about. All the folly of today is indeed as nought as we consider why our nations developed under God. Our nations are in existence only to establish the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. This is why God has made us prosperous, and this is why this prosperity is so much under threat. It is a result of turning away from God.



Deuteronomy 8:18-20 (King James Version)

But thou shalt remember the LORD thy God: for it is he that giveth thee power to get wealth, that he may establish his covenant which he sware unto thy fathers, as it is this day. 


And it shall be, if thou do at all forget the LORD thy God, and walk after other gods, and serve them, and worship them, I testify against you this day that ye shall surely perish.


As the nations which the LORD destroyeth before your face, so shall ye perish; because ye would not be obedient unto the voice of the LORD your God.


In a time of great global financial chaos, is it not time to realise that the laws that have been passed, the immorality that has been tolerated and the suppression of “the letter of the law” have contributed to this time when God is calling upon both Britain and America to repent before Him..

Part 3:  European Treaties that Have Undermined our Protestant Constitutional Acts         

The European Flag                                     

The Treaty of Paris 1951                            

Treaties of Rome 1957                                

British Government’s Treachery              

Holy Roman Empire                                  

Four Institutions                                         

New Philosophy                                          

The Merger Treaty 1965                            

First Budgetary Treaties 1970 & 1975      

Acts of Accession relating to enlargement 1972, 1979, 1985, 1994   

Greenland Treaty 1984                              

Single European Act 1986                         

The Maastricht Treaty 1992                      

Treaty of Amsterdam 1999                        

Treaty of Nice 2001                                    

Treaty of Lisbon 2007 with plan to putInto force from January 2009 



The European Union Flag


The very flag of the E.U. brings concern to the British Protestant determined to restore our nation back to God. This flag has twelve stars, the flag’s designer Arsene Heitz admitting that the apparent twelve star halo of Mary inspired him in his creation.


This apparent reference to Mary and Rome’s apparent fascination with the lady who was a virgin clearly shows the impact Catholicism has had on the European Union and its treaties to form a political and religious pact that many Protestants see as being part of theAntichrist system. Whether the lady in Revelation is Mary however is open to question, and there is a belief that this lady in Revelation is symbolic, the twelve stars representing the tribes of Israel.


Revelation 12:1 (King James Version)


And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: 


Whilst some European officials deny this clear association one only has to see theantichrist attack on our God given acts to understand that this is all clearly all part of the build up to Christ Jesus return.


We examine each treaty that relates directly to the present European Union which many thought to be a mere trading agreement rather than the bringing together of a European State under Rome.


Great Britain is not part of the E.U. The nation voted for a trading not a political union, the political Union being outlaw by our Constitutional Acts.


Devout Roman Catholics were clearly involved with the setting up of what was originally a group of trading nations but is now building up to be a super state ready to impact the whole World.


The Treaty of Paris 1951


This treaty was an agreement between the nations of France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, Luxembourg and The Netherlands to establish the European Coal and Steel Community, an apparent trading agreement. The trading agreement however became part of the E.U. for having been embraced into the European Order it only expired in 2002 exactly fifty years after its inception.


Treaties of Rome 1957


The two treaties of Rome, one setting up the European Economic Community, now the European Union, and another setting up the European Atomic Energy Community were signed by the then member countries Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and West Germany.


The treaties were ratified by the respective Parliaments and came into force on the 1. January 1958.


The treaty relating to the E.E.C. laid down in its preamble intimates a determination to lay the foundations of an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe. This clearly establishes a determination to develop a progressive political integration, a determination outside of the treaty being a mere trading agreement.


British Government ministers and officials who eventually entered this Union unconstitutionally should have recognised Britain’s history of Church and State being together for within this progression of continuous treaties we see a determination to bring together the religions of the Union too, hence this Treaty can be seen as a politically motivated incentive to the multi-faith movement. This was a development separate to the removing of trading tariffs, the latter seeming to be less important that the integration itself.


There are two developments being birthed here, the first being of political integration and the second I believe being to unite the Churches of the European Union into a single order under the Pope. Rome was chosen strategically to fulfil these purposes. The very situation is obvious to those of spiritual discernment that this treaty was a coming together of the old Holy Roman Empire.


The Holy Roman Empire was presented like the European Union as a political entity, its very name however showing a religious factor in the equation. In charge of the Empire was the Pope who installed an Emperor who was originally Charlemagne the Empire being in existence from 962 to 1806.The HRE’s objective of centralising authority into Europe was identical to that of the European Union which was coming out of this Treaty of Rome.Rome was the seat of the Holy Roman Empire and Rome was again to be the spiritual seat of the coming European Union.


The HRE was a growing institution until the 1500’s when it was curtailed by Protestants bringing about the Reformation and so a plan has been drawn with this coming E.U. to bring Protestants back into he fold of Rome. Bibles have been changed to embrace the codices of Vaticanus and Sinaticus rather than the faithful Textus Receptus. Protestant institutions and universities of Protestant countries have been infiltrated to bring about a multi faith agenda of “Churches Together”, churches tolerant to sin and other faiths.


This is the result of this Treaty of Rome, there now only being a remnant standing on Reformation principles.The Empire had its own European Parliament called the Reichstag which passed legislation affecting member states. In Rome this was being re-born. What many thought to be a trading alliance, in fact was the re-birth of the Holy Roman Empire.


Not all communities were represented in the Reichstag but its policies affected all member states, the peoples of these states coming under it statutes and laws, even though they felt isolated from its law making processes. Ask any Council in Britain today if this sounds familiar with Europe instilling its undemocratic powers over its elected chamber.


In legal terms the Holy Roman Empire had its courts just like the European Union admittedly including Protestants into its processes but these Protestants were under a system of Rome that brought over regulation and frustration throughout member states.


With the history and the tensions between Catholic and Protestant, is this European Union being founded with this Treaty in Rome a result of Old and New Testament prophecy? Are we witnessing the building of a great administrative machine that will have a leader with answers to problems presents systems do not allow? Should we as Christians see this Treaty of Rome as a preparation for the Antichrist?  I firmly believe this is so.

In practical terms the Treaty established four institutions; a Commission, a Council of Ministers, a European Parliament and a European Court of Justice, the latter two operations being highly illegal under Britain’s Constitutional Acts which places legal obligation on the Monarch to repress foreign infiltration into our laws. An activity to join this institution therefore under these terms from the very outset was highly treasonable.


EXCERPT FROM 1534 ACT OF SUPREMACY re-instated by Queen Elizabeth I places clear obligation on the Monarch to repress foreign authority over the affairs of Great Britain making the present intolerable situation of European Law highly illegal.the increase of virtue in Christ's religion, and for the conservation of the peace, unity, and tranquility of this realm; any usage, foreign land, foreign authority, prescription, or any other thing or things to the contrary hereof notwithstanding.


We have a legal system that has “law and justice in mercy” right at the heart of its structure but now that our Protestant nation has placed itself under the clutches of this Roman Treaty we have a people over stressed by ridiculous applications of law, a result of the European Union’s legislations that have begun to kill our people through stress.



2 Corinthians 3:5-7 (King James Version)

Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God;  


Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.  


But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away:




Is the Treaty of Rome in line with the laws and Customs of Britain or the Holy Roman Empire?


Is European Law applied with law and justice in mercy by H.M. The Queen?


Are European laws in line with the laws of God?


Is there within European law a provision for the Protestant Gospel?


If the answer is “NO” to just one of these questions – then it is clear that the Treaty of Rome is illegal in Britain.


III. The archbishop of bishop shall say, "Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the people of this Kingdom of England, and the dominions thereto belonging, according to the statutes in Parliament agreed on, and the laws and customs of the same?" 


The King and Queen shall say, "I solemnly promise so to do." 


Archbishop or bishop, "Will you to your power cause law and justice in mercy to be executed in all your judgements?" 

King and Queen, "I will." 


Archbishop or bishop, "Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the laws of God, the true profession of the gospel and the Protestant reformed religion established by law, and will you preserve unto the bishops and clergy of this Realm, and to the churches committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges as by law do or shall appertain unto them, or any of them?" 


King and Queen, "All this I promise to do." 


After this, the King and Queen laying his and her hand upon the holy Gospels, shall say, 
King and Queen, "The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep: So help me God." 

Then the King and Queen shall kiss the book.


A new philosophy was developing with this Treaty of Rome, a philosophy based on man’s achievements rather than God’s through us. An endless tide of monitoring progress had begun, endless league tables, this treaty eventually turning a nation into an endless war zone of stress and breakdown rather than recognizing that our sufficiency is of God; over-regulation and “letter of the law” thinking bringing death rather than the life our own constitutional acts are intended to bring.


This Treaty of Rome was being brought together to end Britain’s Protestant ethos, an ethos that had won us the Second World War with our real partners America; an ethos that is now changing to make us a nation under an Institution rather than God. Instead of promoting democracy and peace in Europe as was presented at the time as being a benefit, the Treaty has promoted over regulation and law much of which is brought together by un-elected officials undermining the British Constitutional demand that we run our own affairs under God.


The Holy Roman Empire has returned with a major change, for this time it has in its clutches Protestant Britain.  We might have been the winner of the War in Europe, but what we have lost is the peace! What are gallant troops fought for in the Great world wars has been given away by traitors to the Protestant British cause.


The Merger Treaty 1965


This Treaty merged the executive bodies of the European Coal and Steel Community, European Atomic Energy Community, and the E.E.C. into one institutional structure.

This development brought about the E.E.C. Commission and the Council of the E.E.C., an action regarded by many as the beginnings of the change from being a mere European Economic Community to being a fully merged European Union.


First Budgetary Treaties 1970 & 1975


These two treaties amended the Treaty of Rome in relation to the budgets of the then E.E.C., the amendments still being in forces in today’s E.U.


Acts of Accession relating to enlargement 1972, 1979, 1985, 1994


A series of acts relating to the enlargement of the European Union occurred in these years, the full apparent member list of countries being as follows:


Country  Applied  Acceeded  

BelgiumN/A01952-07-23 23 July1952

FranceN/A01952-07-23 23 July1952

ItalyN/A01952-07-23 23 July1952

LuxembourgN/A01952-07-23 23 July1952

NetherlandsN/A01952-07-23 23 July1952

W. GermanyN/A01952-07-23 23 July1952

Denmark01967-05-11 11 May196701973-01-01 1 January1973

Ireland01967-05-11 11 May196701973-01-01 1 January1973

United Kingdom01967-05-10 10 May196701973-01-01 1 January1973

Greece01975-06-12 12 June197501981-01-01 1 January1981

Portugal01977-03-28 28 March197701986-01-01 1 January1986

Spain01986-06-28 28 June198601986-01-01 1 January1986

Austria01989-07-17 17 July198901995-01-01 1 January1995

Finland01992-03-18 18 March199201995-01-01 1 January1995

Sweden01991-07-01 1 July199101995-01-01 1 January1995

Cyprus01990-07-03 3 July199002004-05-01 1 May2004

Czech Republic01996-01-17 17 January199602004-05-01 1 May2004

Estonia01995-11-24 24 November199502004-05-01 1 May2004

Hungary01994-03-31 31 March199402004-05-01 1 May2004

Latvia01995-09-13 13 September199502004-05-01 1 May2004

Lithuania01995-12-08 8 December199502004-05-01 1 May2004

Malta01990-07-03 3 July199002004-05-01 1 May2004

Poland01994-04-05 5 April199402004-05-01 1 May2004

Slovakia01995-06-27 27 June199502004-05-01 1 May2004

Slovenia01996-06-10 10 June199602004-05-01 1 May2004

Bulgaria01995-12-14 14 December199502007-01-01 1 January2007

Romania01995-06-22 22 June199502007-01-01 1 January2007


* Note that the European Coal and Steel Community was
founded in 1952. From 1957 to 1993, countries applied
to join the European Economic Community.


Greenland Treaty 1984


Only the dependent territory of Greenland has voted to leave the E.E.C., there seemingly being no provision to do so for main member states.


Only the U.K. has held a referendum to leave the E.U., and this was in 1975 when it would seem the majority of the population saw the community as a trading group rather than a New World Order bringing in a system totally opposed to our Constitutional Acts.


Single European Act 1986


This was the first major revision of the Treaty of Rome that relates to the E.E.C. The Act established the single European market and European political integration, a dangerous act when one considers the constitutional restrictions in Britain, this act having as an objective to harmonize laws and irregularities between countries. An aim of reaching this objective by 1992 was set.


The Maastricht Treaty 1992


This was the Treaty that established the European Union and the new European currency. A concept known as the “Pillar Structure of the European Union” was created with this treaty.


Three pillars of the Union seemed to have developed with the Treaty, the first pillar relating internal matters in the E.U. The second pillar is in the area of common foreign and security policy whilst the third pillar deals with Police and judicial policy.


Ratification of the Treaty was difficult in three states, Denmark, France and Britain with Britain opting out of the social provisions.


What seriously rubs against Britain’s Constitutional Acts is the justice, home affairs and a common foreign and security policy for the Monarch is bound to abide to the Act of Supremacy and repress all such foreign infiltration into our affairs. The Act also gave European citizenship to all member peoples of the new European Union, a concept which should be absolutely rejected in Britain on constitutional grounds.


The Social Chapter of the Treaty which was initially rejected by the British Government was embraced by the last Labour regime who broughty further over-regulation and nonsense to our hard pressed country gasping under the pressures of this new European state.


All this activity in this Treaty has brought major structural and social changes to Britain, our nation no longer making its stand in the World as a Protestant nation, standing under God and showing the World that we are a God fearing victorious country standing on the promises of God. What a change from World War II, our nation now coming under the oppressive regulations that are binding the country up to the end time system of theAntichrist.


Treaty of Amsterdam 1999


This treaty with its emphasis on citizenship and individual rights has a very different structure to our own Constitutional acts, remembering that constitutionally Britain is a theocracy first, with our leaders called to follow the will of God in all laws. This is not the case in this Treaty of Europe.


The Treaty brought about the office of a “High Representative” for E.U. Foreign Policy but we know that we are covenantly together with America and not Europe as has been proved in foreign policy over many years. This is a further infiltration into the affairs of state in Britain.


Treaty of Nice 2001


Reforming the treaties of Rome and Maastrict this further interference into our affairs came into being in 2003. Opponents of the treaty see a bringing about of a greater technocratic unit isolated from the people in centralised Europe, my view being that we are witnessing a coming together of a system ideal for a dictator to take over. Ask yourself, how isolated do we feel from this New World Order operation, a concern clearly coming out in the recent Irish Referendum. The Holy Roman Empire is developing again.


Treaty of Lisbon 2007


With an apparent objective of completing a streamlining programme implemented by the Treaties of Amsterdam and Nice this Treaty is bringing a realisation throughout Europe that this organisation is going at a pace that is taking away individual country identity.


The aspects of the Treaty bringing most attention are as follows:


*  More Qualified Majority Voting in the EU Council.


*  Increased Involvement of the European Parliament in legislation reducing the number of European Commissioners from 27 to 18


*  Elimination of the Pillar System brought in at Maastricht


*  Creation of a President of the European Council


*  Creation of a High Representative for Foreign Affairs


*  Legal binding of a Charter of Fundamental (human) rights. These human rights follow a principle developed by Karel Vasek with the headings of liberty, equality and fraternity.


*  A treaty establishing many of the provisions of the rejected European Constitution, the Treaty believed by many to be a Constitution with another name! Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown signed the Treaty in a quiet setting after the main signing by other nations.

Gordon Brown in effect signed away our Country, its Christian Heritage and Constitution


Christopher Booker of the Daily Mail reported in the paper's edition of 14th December 2007 described the signing as "surreptitious"! He stated that this signing marked the day when our country finally abandoned any pretence to exist in its own right. Well in memory of our great troops who fought for our once great nation, I can tell them emphatically that our great Protestant Constitutional acts that forbid any handing over of our nation to a foreign power are far bigger and much more enforceable in law that this miserable signature of a Prime Minister that bowed down to a foreign power steeped in Roman History.


Booker refers to the non involvement of a British people whose children have been educated away from understanding our heritage, a British people who only voted for free trade rather than the binding legalism of an EU that has stolen our operating rights of a free country. In effect Booker points out the action made Britain (no longer Great) a province from being a country.


The journalist rightfully discerned ten ways that our lives in Britain would change, remembering of course that the signing is inconsistent with our Constitutional acts which can be applied at any time by the British Citizen who now must know them if the citizen is to walk freely.


1)  The British people became "citizens of the European Union"


2) An unelected European President would appear chosen by the heads of government in the European Council.


3)  An unelected Foreign Minister would appear with his own diplomatic corps and worldwide embassies, an office that would gradually take over from the foreign offices of individual countries.


4)  The European Council would now have members who would put the interest of the Union above their own country.


5)  The Treaty removed the right for each country to be represented by its own Commissioner, the power to propose new las coming through the unelected Commission.


6)  Greater power is given to the unelected powers at Brussells to dictate laws and policies that overide the laws of elected national Parliaments.


7) The treaty made a common defence policy much more likely.


8)  The treaty made a common Police Force much more likely.


9)  The treaty made a common energy policy much more likely.


10) The treaty made it much more likely to bring about the end of national run finances to global systems.


The sinister background to this Treaty brings up many questions in relation to the sovereignty of member nations, particularly as member nations have been showing concern over losing their national identity.


The usual technique of the New World Order is to bring about economic decline and provide an answer in relation to bringing about their call to a One World Government and a One World Religion. Economic recovery will be shown to come with more international integration of government and world peace will be promised through multi faith cults like the Anglicans through integration of religions. This integration operation will have a dynamic leader that will fool even the very elect!


It’s an old trick but very effective. It is not surprising so many are being fooled by it for the Bible gives this warning.


Matthew 24: 24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.


Just wait for these integration policies to arise out of the instability in the World both in international relations and finances. No wonder the Bible warns us of the end times.



2 Corinthians 6:15 (King James Version)

And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?

Part 4:  Unconstitutional Laws and

Statutes since joining the

European Union                                     

Examples of Over Regulation                   

Examples of

European Political Correctness                

“Living in sin”                                              


The Infiltration into our

Education System                                               

Emphasis on the Human Rights given

To a Mother to kill rather than the

Human Rights of a child to live

Part 4:

Unconstitutional Laws and Statutes since joining the European Union


2 Corinthians 3:5-7 (King James Version)


Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God;

Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.


But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away:


Examples of Over-regulation


Crazy regulations are part of living in a European Union member state. Gone are the common sense values of our constitutional acts which demanded that law be applied with “law and justice in mercy”. Gone are the Biblical principals of applying law with wisdom from what is still constitutionally a Protestant state, ridiculous laws being applied by the letter bringing health problems and misery throughout our nation.


Proverbs 4 (King James Version)


5 Get wisdom, get understanding: forget it not; neither decline from the words of my mouth.


6 Forsake her not, and she shall preserve thee: love her, and she shall keep thee.


7 Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding.

E.U. regulations have been set up in relation as to how far a banana curves, this being important in relation to weighing up its size!

A Yorkshire Bus Company looked to get over E.U. safety regulations applied a rule getting passengers

to get off the bus half way through a journey, then getting them to get on the bus with the same driver!

The European Standardization Committee introduced voluntary guidelines for the height of swings in playgrounds,

this height being no more than three metres high. How did Councils manage before the issue of guidelines or did they use common sense then?

In September 2001 our truckers on an E.U. advanced driving course were given lessons on diet that had a bias towards the new politically correct emphasis on muesli for breakfast rather than the truckers traditional fry up!

The Daily Telegraph in 2003 reported that the latest E.U. requirement on farmers was that they had to label each egg produced with their name and home address, the details of the hen who laid the egg, the method of production, and the code for the producer packer and a sell by date. A Brussels E.U. official stated that this would be a nice job for a farmer’s wife! This is an example of over regulation bringing massive increased costs to businesses. It’s barmy! Which one should she label first?


This is just a sample of many many stories flying around that have given much amusement to many people, but these stories have behind them a very sinister attack giving managers, teachers, doctors, lawyers etc. etc. terrific pressures preventing them in many cases from doing their jobs right, these examples going against the customs of how we have operated for centuries thus making these laws constitutionally unsound in Britain.




III. The archbishop or bishop shall say, "Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the people of this Kingdom of England, and the dominions thereto belonging, according to the statutes in Parliament agreed on, and the laws and customs of the same?"


The examples given are laws not within our customs and are thus constitutionally illegal.

*  Examples of European Political Correctness

A new moral code has developed in Britain as a result of a phenomenon called political correctness. Even the “Bibles” have changed to fit into this new way of living:


It is politically incorrect to say that a couple living together outside of marriage are “living in sin” as in the KJV.


1 Corinthians 6:18 (King James Version)

Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.


The Law Encyclopaedia defines fornication as “Sexual intercourse between a man and a woman who are not married to each other.”  The KJV declares this to be sin.


Not however in the new politically correct Bibles of Roman origin, however.


NIV  I Cor. 6:18 Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a man commits are outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body.


NKJV I Cor. 6:18 Flee sexual immorality. Every sin that a man does is outside the body, but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body.


“Sexual immorality” is interpreted in modern culture as not meaning living together; the modern “Christian” would define this as having many partners for example.


It is politically incorrect to say that a homosexual relationship is wrong, the KJV declaring this to be sin.


KJV  I Cor. 6: 9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,


KJV Jude 7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.


“Abusers of themselves with mankind” and “going after strange flesh” are clear references to homosexual practice in the KJV. This however has got so politically incorrect in the EU  that a homosexual could civilly sue the preacher for expounding on these Biblical points. The nation's constitutional acts protects the Preacher however as he is legally called upon to expound the Protestant, not Roman scriptures. This however we write in constitutional law but no general practice.

The new “Bibles” of Roman origin like the E.U. do not portray homosexual practice as sin like the KJV does. 


NIV I Cor. 6:  9 Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders


NKJV I Cor. 6: 9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals,(a) nor sodomites, Footnotes: a 1 Corinthians 6:9 That is, catamites


NIV Jude 7 In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire.


The NIV refers only to homosexual offenders, the injunction therefore not applying to homosexuals, only to homosexuals that offend.


The Jude reference makes no reference at all to homosexuals, only to Sodom, it being a common view amongst liberals that the “sin of Sodom” was inhospitality rather than homosexuality.


The NKJV is even more politically correct because its injunction is not against homosexuals but against homosexuals who are catamites.

A catamite is the younger partner in a pederastic relationship with an older male.


Whilst the NKJV Jude passage does refer to “strange flesh” it is fair to say that it is still part of a politically correct operation to undermine the laws of God which clearly disallows homosexuality as a legal activity.


In the European Community the one under threat of legal action is not the homosexual but the one who offends the homosexual, a situation contrary to our constitutional acts.


These acts protect us from legal prosecution whether criminal or civil, bishops and clergy of the realm being allowed to administer the true Gospel, and that Gospel in English can only be found in the “politically incorrect” KJV! Again we speak in law and not in practice.


EXCERPT FROM THE 1689 Act Establishing the Coronation Oath


Archbishop or bishop, "Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the laws of God, the true profession of the gospel and the Protestant reformed

religion established by law, and will you preserve unto the bishops and clergy of this Realm, and to the churches committed to their charge, all such

rights and privileges as by law do or shall appertain unto them, or any of them?"


KJV Romans 1:


24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 

25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.


Article 13 however of the EC treaty bans discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation, however a concept completely at odds with the Bible of

the British Crown and the Queen’s promise to keeps the laws of God.


*  The Infiltration into our Education System


The European Union in its bid to be part of promoting the New World Order had been steadily infiltrating the Education System of Britain to move it away from its successful Protestant ethos so that new generations can bring about a society devoid of radical and determined Christianity thus making way for the end time system of the Antichrist.


In the majority of countries in the European Union there is an inspectorate to see that the education of children is in line with European rather than national standards. This is a gross interference in the bringing up of our children who are now showing real signs of losing their national identity in a globalised world. Indeed the Council of the European Union admits that there have been economic and social changes in Europe which a teacher has to cope with. This admission of failure by the European Union is refreshing because it is because of their disgusting infiltration into our education system that there have been these changes bringing distress, heartache, nervous breakdown and even suicide.


Had we kept to the principles of our God given constitutional acts, then we would have had stability in education and in other fields. Now we have a breaking society with today’s youth being referred to as the “lost generation.” We need to get out of this evil of Europe now and return to the stability of our Protestant faith.


Malachi 3:6-7 (King James Version)


For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.


Even from the days of your fathers ye are gone away from mine ordinances, and have not kept them. Return unto me, and I will return unto you, saith the LORD of hosts. But ye said, Wherein shall we return? 


*  Emphasis on the Human Rights given to a mother to kill rather than the human rights of a unborn child to live


The World today is in such a state that one in three pregnancies ends up with a baby being killed deliberately. Worldwide 40 million abortions are performed per year meaning that since 1980 one billion children have been slaughtered, far more than King Herod could have ever contemplated.


There surely have to be doctors within the European Union who look to honour the original Hippocratic Oath that declares: Nor will I give a woman a pessary to procureabortion.


The European Union however running roughshod over the original Hippocratic Oath and Great Britain’s Constitutional Acts which place great emphasis on keeping the laws of God are saying that even Doctors who have conscientious objections should be forced to kill an unborn child.

The actual words of the European Union Network of Independent Experts on Fundamental Rights are as follows:


…….. doctors should be forced to perform abortions, even if they have conscientious objections, because the right to abort a child is an “international human right.”


Let’s get this right …. It is now an international human right to be able to kill a child according to the European Union. Where does that place all of the EU Human Rights Legislation.


Answer – in the bin for if an organization can support the wholesale massacre of children under the name of human rights, then we are dealing with the pit of hell.

This is why the Bible says we do not have human rights, constitutionally therefore in Britain for we have God as our Head.


1 Corinthians 6:19-20 (King James Version)

What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? 

For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.


With our Monarch having promised to “keep the laws of God” there is an obligation on our nation to have nothing to do with the horrendous declaration of Europe more akin to the Nazi concentration camps than to an apparent civilised Europe.


The Bible is clear when referring to children in wombs as being fully human.


Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.Psalm of David. Psalm 51:5 KJV 

But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.Matthew 1:20 KJV


The Bible calls unborn children “children” the same word used of infants and young children.


And it came to pass, that, when Elisabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the babe leaped in her womb; and Elisabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost:

For, lo, as soon as the voice of thy salutation sounded in mine ears, the babe leaped in my womb for joy.

And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes lying in a manger.

And they came with haste, and found Mary, and Joseph, and the babe lyingin a manger.

Luke 1:41,44; 2:12,16. KJV 


If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her,and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman’s husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judgesdetermine.Ex. 21:22 KJV


The Bible declares that the unborn are created by God, as God created Adam and Eve in his image.


For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother’ womb.Psalm 139:13 KJV 


So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.Gen. 1:27


Old Testament punishment for those doing harm to the unborn is the same as to an adult.


If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her,and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman’s husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judgesdetermine.Ex. 21:22 KJV

Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.Gen. 9:6 KJV


Christ Jesus was human from the point he was conceived in Mary’s womb.


But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.


And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.Matthew 1:20,21 KJV

And in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God unto a city of Galilee, named Nazareth.

To a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin’s name was Mary.Luke 1:26,27. KJV


God’s image includes male and female, and it is a scientific fact that sex is determined from conception.


So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.Gen. 1:27 KJV


The Bible uses personal pronouns to describe unborn children.


Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.Jeremiah 1:5 KJV


But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins. Matthew 1:20,21 KJV


The Bible declares that God knows the unborn personally and intimately, just as He would know any other person.


My substance was not hid from thee, when I was made in secret, andcuriously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth.

Thine eyes did see my substance, yet being unperfect; and in thy book all my members were written, which in continuance were fashioned, when as yet there was none of them.Psalm 139:15,16 KJV


Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.Jeremiah 1:5 KJV


The Bible declares that the unborn are even called by God before birth.


And the children struggled together within her; and she said, If it be so, whyam I thus? And she went to inquire of the Lord.

And the Lord said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.

Gen. 25:22,23 KJV 


And there was a certain man of Zorah, of the family of the Danites, whose name was Manoah; and his wife was barren and bare not. And the angel of the Lord appeared unto the woman, and said unto her, Behold now, thou artbarren, and bearest not: but thou shalt conceive, and bear a son. Now therefore beware, I pray thee, and drink not wine nor strong drink, and eat not any unclean thing: For, lo, thou shalt conceive and bear a son; and no razor shall come on his head: for the child shalt be a Nazarite unto God from the womb: and he shall begin to deliver Israel out of the hand of the Philistines. Then the woman came and told her husband, saying, A man of God came unto me, and his countenance was like the countenance of an angel of God, very terrible: but I asked him not whence he was, neither told he me his name: But he said unto me, Behold, thou shalt conceive, and bear a son; and now drink no wine nor strong drink, neither eat any unclean thing: for the child shall be a Nazarite to God from the womb to the day of his death.Judges 13:2-7 KJV 


Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The Lord hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name.And now, saith the Lord that formed me from the wombto be his servant, to bring Jacob again to him, Though Israel be not gathered, yet shall I be glorious in the eyes of the Lord, and my God shall be my strength.Isaiah 49:1,5 KJV 


But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother’s womb, and called me from my mother’s womb, and called me by his grace, Galatians 1:15 KJV


Killing children is not maintaining the laws of God and to be in an organisation that promotes such activity is not keeping the “laws of God”


EXCERPT FROM THE 1689 Act Establishing the Coronation Oath


Archbishop or bishop, "Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the laws of God, the true profession of the gospel and the Protestant reformed religion established by law, and will you preserve unto the bishops and clergy of this Realm, and to the churches committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges as by law do or shall appertain unto them, or any of them?"


We are living in an era in which our own national and local laws have to be in line with European legislation. What we have witnessed is that these legislations of Europe have brought confusion, ludicrous over-regulation and a mass slaughter of innocents with E.U. Officials declaring the rights of a mother to kill be higher than the rights of a child to live.


There is only one originator of this union.


John 10: 10 KJV 


The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy

Part 5:  Solutions 


The Ancient Landmark                              

Actions                                                         Philosophical Spirit in Britain                  

Restoring the Landmark                            

Only “Begotten Son of God”                      

No earthly logic  

Proverbs 22:28 (King James Version)

Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set.


It would seem that in practice the ancient landmark of our constitutional acts has been removed. The Bible whose laws our Monarch swore to keep on behalf of the nation placing greater emphasis on what "is written" than what is paracticed!


Matthew 4:5-7 (King James Version)

Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple,  


And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.  


Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.


To restore our nation back to God there has to be a time of deep rooted repentance beginning from the top so as our nation once more can stand in obedience with our mighty Creator.


The following actions are required by God in this nation to enable our title of “Great” to be restored.


I.      Our nation needs to repent for the lack of awareness of our great Protestant constitutional acts. The Acts of Supremacy of 1534 and 1559 are still in force yet little is known of them.


II.      An action to educate the population of Great Britain including our children and all immigrants need to occur. It needs to be understood that living in this country involves giving adherence to these Protestant acts establishing our nation for all time as a Protestant country of the Protestant Reformed Religion. Lack of adherence will be seen as an act of high treason.


III.      Living in Great Britain involves understanding that the nation is obligated before God to increase virtue of Christ’s Religion. As this is a statement of the Protestant Reformation the nation from its income needs to support and encourage Ministers of the Protestant Reformed Faith to carry out this task on behalf of the Monarch who is by law bound to oversee this awesome calling.


IV.      The Anglican Cult to be a Church again needs to rid itself of all its pagan infiltrations outlined in our presentation The Anglican Cult and become a fully endorsed Protestant Church without high altars, un-authorised “Bibles” and the like.


V.      All extremity in the nation must be dealt with severely so the nation once more can be at peace, all foreign infiltration into our affairs being repressed.


VI.      That it be fully understood in the nation that any attempt to repeal or change our Protestant Constitutional Acts be seen as an act of High Treason. This includes any future attempt to change the Coronation Oath established in 1689 to any multi-faith agenda. The Monarch must be Defender of the Faith, not defender of faiths.


VII.      Those in Government and in the State Church who have not adhered to the acts be brought to account in a Ecclesiastical Court that needs to be set up with Ministers of the Protestant Reformed Religion Established by Law.


VIII.      A State Document be produced for all servants of the Monarch who are honour bound to keep the terms of her Oath. The Protestant laws, statutes and customs must be maintained with law and justice in mercy executed in all judgments.


IX.      All laws not in line with the laws of God be understood never to have been laws, there being in our Constitutional acts a demand for laws to be in line with the Word of God.


X.      That the nation understands as Queen Elizabeth I understood that the Crown is subject to no power except Christ Jesus alone. Thus the contents of this presentation is a Thus saith the Lord to Queen and Country.


XI.      Any attempt to quieten the Preaching of the Protestant Gospel be seen as an Act of High Treason thus this presentation is a warning to forces suppressing Ministers who preach on the streets. They are to be left alone to preach God’s Holy Word.


XII.      In view of the move to multi-faith and European integration and globalisation that the Monarch re-affirm her Protestant vows to keep her nation under God.


XIII.      The black and white floors plus the High Altars of Cathedrals and what is known as Churches in the land be removed along with gargoyles, artefacts and relics of Baal worship so evident in Anglican property.


XIV.      Gnosticism and pagan “Bibles” coming from codices like Vaticanus andSinaiticus be outlawed from the land including schools, universities and “churches” – there being a repentant move back to the true Authorised by the Monarch Bible described as “wisdom, royal law, the lively oracles of God.”


XV.      A teaching be given to the nation of the significance of Zadok as opposed to Eli, the Zadok priesthood having been referred to in the Coronation Service of 1953. This principle firmly emphasises the needs of God before the needs of man, the Church being the Body of Christ Jesus and not a physical building.


XVI.      The complete rejection of Corpus Juris in favour of Habeas Corpus and Magna Carta be fully understood in the nation.


XVII.      All Roman Catholics be ousted from the Royal Family in the same way that Protestants cannot be in line for Papal office.


XVIII.      Wales uses the Christian flag of Wales rather than the pagan counterfeit.


XIX.      Wales, Scotland and Ireland (Northern Ireland at first with the South being given the opportunity to be a Protestant nation too as an equal partner in the U.K.) leaving their controlled under Brussels Parliaments to enjoy the liberty of Great Britain’s Protestant Constitution.


XX.      Ireland (including the South if they choose) to embrace the doctrines of Patrick rather the Alexandrian doctrines of Catholicism.


XXI.      The special relationship with America recognised as being a result of the Mayflower Compact.


XXII.      Immediate withdrawal from the European Union, the Holy Roman Empire in disguise.


XXIII.      Acceptance that the British people were conned into thinking they were joining a trading community rather than a political and religious one.


XXIV.      Recognition that European Law is not in line with the laws and customs of Britain.


XXV.      Recognition that our nation has been over-stretched as a result of European Law and so a process of bringing back our nation to applying law with law and justice in mercy must begin.


XXVI.      Removal of European “poltical correctness” from the nation.


XXVII.      Restoration of our Education System under British perspectives rather than European Law perspectives.


XXVIII.      Immediate action to prevent any more unborn children being slaughtered and all those responsible for the past slaughter brought to justice.

The philosophical spirit in Britain may scoff at the commands of God but God is really giving a final warning in relation to judgment which has already begun.


1 Corinthians 3:18-23 (King James Version)

Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise.  


For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.  


And again, The Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain.  


Therefore let no man glory in men. For all things are your's;  Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas, or the world, or life, or death, or things present, or things to come; all are your's;  And ye are Christ's; and Christ is God's.


God longs for Britain to repent and become great again but this cannot be the case until the nation comes to its knees before him.



John 3:16-21 (King James Version)

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.  


For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.  


He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.  


And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.  


For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.  But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.


This is the only “begotten Son of God”, begotten not created, of the same substance as the Father longing for Britain to back to him. As Nicodemus found earthy logic is futile, this truly is God pleading to the nation to come back to him.


Of course there is no earthly logic to the contents of this presentation. This is God calling his nation back to him, his prophets having to become fools through suffering and heartache to be able to cry out the voice of God to the people.


We know the futile attempts to bring the remnant to nothing. We know the futile attempts to globalise the Church through "Churches Together" style groupings. We know the workings of globalisation through the elimination of local identity in our high streets. We know the attempts in education to remove understanding of our heritage and national identity to produce a worldwide race of global thinkers.


We know the attempts of the system to remove men standing on the old landmarks by false accusation of monetary and sexual malpractice. We know we are dealing with men who are in fear of all of this but despite if it all the scripture is still true.



1 John 4:4 (King James Version)


Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.


It is time for the remnant to stand up! We carry the "it is written" as as the Holy Ghost anoints us to speak out given words of Christ Jesus at given times, so that which has been stolen shall be returned.



Proverbs 6:30-31 (King James Version)

Men do not despise a thief, if he steal to satisfy his soul when he is hungry; But if he be found, he shall restore sevenfold; he shall give all the

substance of his house.


We so much want our nation to come back to God, for we know without this action there are eternal consquences for continued disobedience to God's call will continue to bring a once great nation under the control of the Antichrist, an action contrary to the demands of our constitutional acts.

To sum up: The Choice of Europe rather than our

Constitutional Acts costs this ......

Here are 60 facts and figures taken from The EU In A Nutshell by Dr Lee Rotherham of the TaxPayers' Alliance

and a leading expert on the European Union.

1 Of the 32,949 European Commission staff only 1,322 (4 per cent) are British.

2 A whopping £1.5billion per year is spent on pay and primary allowances to European Commission staff.

3 The Commission's budget for furniture and office equipment alone totals £69.8million.

4 The Commission's budget dedicates £6.3million to "inter-institutional co-operation in the social sphere" which funds holiday centres, staff clubs, sports centres and medals for long-serving or retiring staff.

Millions lavished on limousines, nonsensical initiatives and costly art. On their 60th anniversary, we take a look at the eye-watering wastefulness of our Eurocrats 


5 Across the EU there are 15 private European Schools for staff, run at a cost of £122million per year.

6 MEPs' salaries cost the European taxpayer £52.6million per year but their travel expenses are £66.8million.

7 The European Parliament's £3.9million budget to cover the cost of staff joining, transferring or leaving last year included compensation for a probationary official "because his work is obviously inadequate".

8 About £5.1million is set aside to run the European Parliament's vehicle fleet, which includes chauffeur-driven cars and a bicycle collection.
SEARCH for: 


9 The European Parliament sets aside £1.97million each year for its cultural activities budget that funds, among others, a peace prize and a prize for European cinema.

10 Each year £110,000 is given to the European Parliamentary Association, a club for serving MEPs. It organises conferences, debates, dinners, concerts and sports-bar-style gatherings, with an HQ in Strasbourg.

11 Even when you kick them out of office, MEPs remain aboard the Brussels gravy train. The European Parliament has a £157,000 annual budget to fund meetings of the association of former MEPs.

12 The Parliament has an art collection of more than 350 paintings and sculptures, including Le Prophète (a sculpture of a walnut on a pedestal in a hand shake), Blackmagic (a naked woman sitting by an upturned flower vase as lightning splits a neighbouring dog asunder) and Blue Exercise (an image of a woman's genitalia).

13 As part of the mission to promote a common European identity, £43million is earmarked each year for political factions in the European Parliament, such as the Party of European Socialists, to fund political activities.

14 At meetings of the European Council, the UK holds just 29 votes out of 345 (8.4 per cent).

15 The European Court of Justice spent £17.2million on judges' salaries and allowances last year, with the wages bill for their 1,954 support staff amounting to £158million.

16 Despite remaining outside the eurozone, the UK was still contributing £46million to the European Central Bank as of 2010 as its assigned share of capital.

17 The European Commission has formed working groups for consultation purposes including: High Level Group On Gender Mainstreaming, Classification Of Beef Carcasses, Cinema Expert Group and of course the Expert Group Dialogue On The Use Of Sex As An Actuarial Factor.

18 Among many campaign groups lobbying and providing advice to the European Commission are the European Ice Cream Association, the European Squirrel Initiative and at least eight claiming to represent the Order of the Knights Templar.

19 The infamous EU food mountains and wine lakes remain. As of 2010 these included 62,103 hectolitres of alcohol (enough to fill two-and-a-half Olympic swimming pools), 4.53 million tonnes of cereals and 194,806 tonnes of skimmed milk powder.

20 In 2011 a £197,000 grant was made for a study on consumer acceptance in the EU and elsewhere of pig meat and meat products from male pigs not surgically castrated, with £24,000 available for setting up a website.

21 In 2010 the cost of the Common Agriculture Policy to the UK was calculated to be £10.3billion - £398 for every household in the country.

22 Among the more unlikely recent British recipients of Common Agricultural Policy grants were: HM Prison Service (£290,000), Cambridge Pet Crematorium (£69,000), a steam engine museum (£37,700), Westminster City Council (£17,500), Eton College (£5,300) and Belfast International Airport (£1,500).

23 The biggest current EU spending package on a transport system upgrade is on the railway from Berlin in Germany to Palermo in Sicily, costing an eye-watering £763million.

24 In 2008 alone, the EU had a £162.3million budget for communication - three times that for tackling fraud and two-and-a-half times that for negotiating international trade on behalf of member states.

25 The European Commission's Directorate-General (Communications) enjoys a £6.5million budget to support debates, events and conferences simply to "enhance the European Union's profile".

26 There is a £2million pot to support trips by schoolchildren and others to the European Commission, with a further £16,000 available to fund meals for visitors to European Commissioners.

27 A £7.5million budget exists to support the teaching of EU integration via the Jean Monnet programme, which has supported 1,650 professors in 72 countries over the past two decades.

28 A budget of £2million supports the EU's cultural ambassadors such as the European Saxophone Ensemble, with previous ambassadors including French singer Charles Aznavour and British Labour MP Keith Vaz.

29 Since 2006 the EU has spent £55million of its international aid budget on the Regional Drought Preparedness Programme for the Horn of Africa.

30 When the Italian government won an additional milk quota worth £188.7million in 2009, it owed £1.45billion in unpaid milk fines.

31 In 2009-10, 699 people were surrendered by the UK under European Arrest Warrants while only 71 were surrendered to the UK.

32 While the UK government has MI5, the European Commission has DS.2 - its own point of contact with national intelligence services, a unit responsible for gathering intelligence on threats relating to Commission security.

33 The EU spends an annual £102.2million on interpreters yet one sixth of their time is wasted due to meetings being cancelled at the last minute.

34 When a German news channel took swabs from lavatories in the European Parliament, 41 out of 46 tested positive for cocaine.

35 Thanks to the Common Fisheries Policy, the number of fishermen in the UK has dropped from 21,443 in 1970 to 12,700 in 2008.

36 The UK's net imports of fish hit £975million in 2006, to replace lost domestic fishing capacity.

37 The Common Fisheries Policy costs every UK household £3.58 a week in shopping trolley terms.

38 In 2007 British fishermen threw 23,600 tonnes of cod, 31,048 of haddock and 6,000 of whiting back into the sea to comply with the Common Fisheries Policy.

39 The EU has a £3.1billion International Relations budget run by the External Action Service.

40 The EU has usurped the power of member states by declaring itself the sole negotiating authority in 41 international agreements.

41 Incredibly there are 11 EU defence institutions including the Civilian Planning And Conduct Capacity and the EU Institute for Security Studies.

42 A handbook listing the offices of lobbying operations set up in Brussels by regions runs to 136 pages. As of 2008, Devon alone had seven lobbying staff in Brussels.

43 The European Investment Bank, which is financially autonomous from the European Commission, has capital of £183billion and about 1,000 staff.

44 The EU's Central Library has an annual buying budget of £2.1million. Its cost-effectiveness adds up to £560 per book loaned.

45 The barely known body called the European Group On Ethics In Science And New Technologies has investigated moral issues such as those surrounding doping in sport and animal cloning.

46 A building specifications manual for Commission offices runs to 398 pages with 16 types of trolley identified for use in the kitchens under regulations.

47 The European Institute For Gender Equality has an annual operating budget of £4.6million.

48 EU satellite programmes are managed by the European GNSS Supervisory Authority, with the Galileo programme alone intended to consist of 30 satellites.

49 The European Security and Defence College is headquartered in Brussels but is a virtual college with courses in five countries.

50 The European Police College, based in Hampshire, organises 60-100 courses and seminars each year and may be the prototype for a proposed College Of European Diplomacy.

51 The European University Institute based in Florence, which began in 1972, has an annual operating budget of £41million.

52 The British Government estimates the EU is responsible for 31 per cent of UK red tape, costing £7.1billion in new red tape per year.

53 If EU staff go on strike, a whopping £21.2million a day is saved on salaries.

54 The civil servant in charge of the European Parliament reportedly earns £170,000 per year. Britain's Baroness Ashton, the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, earns £230,000.

55 An EU Ambassador to Africa earns an estimated £149,500 a year before bonuses.

56 The MEPs' limousine budget is £4.1million, with committee chairmen, political group leaders, the President and - for a set period past presidents - eligible for their own car and driver.

57 Of a £2.4million grant once intended for irrigation and greenhouses in Spain, 98 per cent was spent on cardboard boxes.

58 A Commission official once claimed a reported ransom of £7.9million after staging his own kidnap in Colombia.

59 The UK's gross contribution to the EU budget since joining equates to £238billion.

60 UK exports to EU states are worth £273billion annually whereas imports from the EU into the UK are worth £325billion, giving the UK an EU trade deficit of £52billion.

Constitutional Violation? By Rev David P Griffiths


In writing this piece, I point out right away that this is written in line with my constitutional obligation as a Minister of the Protestant Reformed Religion Established by Law (1698 Act Establishing the Coronation Oath) to ensure that there are no foreign political and legal systems affecting our life in Britain.


In my view there are many and I am grateful to Daniel Hannan MEP for his expert analysis of what he describes as Britain’s “doomed marriage” to Europe.


Daniel Hannan: A Doomed Marriage – Britain and Europe

2012 Notting Hills Editions, London


Hannan is clear in his condemnation of the European process: It’s not just the euro crisis; it’s the whole rotten scheme. It will no longer do to think of the EU as a fine idea that has been botched in the implementation. Its very basis, the merger of different nationalities within a single political system, is flawed …..


The consequences of the European ideal in almost removing from Britain the huge God-given benefits in honouring the Oath our Monarch gave to God, an oath that does not allow foreign interference into our political and legal systems, an oath that does not allow adherence to alien philosophies that have even influenced court cases in Britain proving in my view that we can no longer expect the principle of Habeas Corpus to be adhered to for Corpus Juris is rapidly taking over!


Hannan produces evidences of alarming consequences of Britain’s ignoring of its Constitution, consequences that are affecting us all. We as a Charity and church Ministry are responsible for our uses of resources. Government should be giving an example to the country on this but with taxpayer’s money in 2010, at a time of budget cutting the European Parliament allocated £112.5 million to a Brussels Museum of European History & Unification. The nonsense of this is that Europe has had a divisive history – not a unified one with 55 million Europeans dying in the wars of 1914 & 1945.


In addition member states to join put aside their heritage and culture for in addition to the putting aside of Britain’s Monarch’s Oath to God, Poland softened abortion laws, Croatia handed over war criminals and Turkey has eased restrictions on minorities.


We witness in Europe the principle that “big is beautiful” and that being big one would prosper more but these questions need to be answered


i)             Why is Hong Kong wealthier than China?

ii)          Why is Indonesia wealthier than Brunei?

iii)       Why is Switzerland wealthier than all of the EU? P 6/7


It is interesting to know that the wealthiest countries in the World per head of population are

(GDP per capita)


I)            Liechtenstein:               $141,100          (2008 est.) 

II)          Qutar:                           $102,700          (2011 est.)

III)         Luxembourg                 $84,700            (2011 est)

IV)         Bermuda                       $69,900            (2004 est)

V)          Singapore                      $59,900            (2011 est)

VI)         Jersey                             $57,000             (2005 est)

VII)       Falkland Islands             $55,400           (2002 est)

VIII)      Norway                          $53,300           (2011 est)

IX)         Brunei                            $49,400           (2011 est)

X)          Hong Kong                     $49,300           (2011 est)

XI)         UAE                               $48,500           (2011 est)

XII)        USA                                $48,100           (2011 est)

XIII)       Guernsey                        $44,600           (2005 est)

XIV)        Cayman Islands            $43,800           (2004 est)

XV)         Switzerland                   $43,400           (2011 est)

XVI)        Gibraltar                       $43,000           (2006 est)

XVII)        Netherlands                 $42,500           (2011 est)

XVIII)       Austria                        $41,700           (2011 est)

XIX)         Australia                      $40,800           (2011 est)

XX)          Kuwait                         $40,700           (2011 est)


The point here is that 18 of the 20 countries are small – USA being the most decentralised of them all           


Hannan has produced evidence that those who oppose Europe are seen as dangerous and possible warmongers:


Herman Van Rompuy, EU President on 2012 said:


We have together to fight the danger of a new Euroscepticism. The biggest enemy of Europe today is fear. Fear leads to egoism, egoism leads to nationalism, and nationalism leads to war.


Our reply: You can be at peace with your neighbour, one can love one’s neighbour, one can do business deals with one’s neighbour without having to join in a marriage of political and legal integration that denies God given national constitutions.


Daniel Hannan has discovered however that European wars have been ideological rather than nationalistic.


i)             Plenty of wars with ideological rather than nationalistic roots; i.e. the Reformation was ideological – not nationalistic and that continues today.

ii)          The thirty years war (1618-48) – longest continuous European war divided people by faith – not nationalism and that has not gone away!

iii)       Second World War & the Cold War primarily ideological along the range from Fascism and Communism.

iv)        When nationalism the cause of the conflict – then that happens when you integrate those of other states into a new state (i.e. the ethnic tensions in Europe today by cross integration have developed breeding grounds for nationalism.


It is clear to me therefore that basis of European integration argument is based on a fundamental lie, the EU being seen as a massive vehicle for re-distributing wealth. Hannan concludes:


Taxpayers of all states contribute (though their contributions are hidden among the national tax-takes) and the revenue is then used to purchase the allegiance of articulate and powerful groups: consultants, contractors, big landowners, NGO’s, corporations, charities, municipalities.


Unsurprisingly the people running the EU have little time for the concept of representative government. The unelected President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Durao Barroso, argues that nation states are dangerous precisely because they are excessively democratic:


“Governments are not always right. If governments were always right we would not have the situation that we have today. Decisions taken by the most democratic institutions in the world are very often wrong.


Now look at this for putting ourselves under a non-democratic control: The power is in the European Commission for this is the only body that can propose legislation – THIS IS THE GREAT CONCENTRATION OF POWER – a commission of 27 unelected members – the elected governments and councils are UNDER THIS!


Hannan continues: When, for example, referendums go the wrong way, Eurocrats think nothing of swatting the results aside. When Denmark voted against the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, Ireland against the Nice Treaty in 2001 and Ireland (again) against the Lisbon Treaty in 2008, people were told to go away and try again. When France and the Netherlands voted against the European Commission in 2005, the verdict was simply disregarded.


Tony Blair’s democracy: The British people are sensible enough to know that, even if they have a certain prejudice about Europe, they don’t expect their government necessarily to share it or act upon it.


To Tony Blair – governments are not to act on how the people feel – so European Election turnouts have gone down each time for what is the point?


1979: 62%

1984: 59%

1989: 58.4%

1994: 56.7%

1999: 49.5%

2004: 45.6%

2009: 43.1%


The solution to European supporters is for the people to receive more information & more propaganda or is it the people recognising the hopeless position of a democratic voice?


The USA elections which are recognised as democratic have rising turnouts:


2000: 51.3%

2004: 56.7%

2008: 61.4%


We now come to the disastrous economic policies of the European Union, disasters that politicians at the beginning of the twenty first century could not foresee, politician completely out of line with British Christian Constitution and remember we are primarily acting here as protectors of our Constitutional Acts.


Look at the Lib Dem Position in 2002:


The euro, despite gloomy predictions from anti-Europeans, has proved to be a success. We cannot afford to be isolated from our biggest and closest trading partner any longer. Charles Kennedy.


Look at a Conservative Position in the same year.


Opponents of the euro have been disheartened as their predictions of chaos and disaster have failed to materialise. The reality of the euro has exposed the absurdity of many anti-European scares while increasing the public thirst for information. Public opinion is always changing as people can see the success of the new currency on the mainland. Kenneth Clarke.


Daniel Hannan continues: The trouble is that the people running the EU refuse to learn anything from the failure of their project. Since the crisis began, they have pursued only one policy: bailout and borrow. When it doesn’t work, they accelerate it. For years, EU leaders have been condition to spend public money. The first instinct of a Eurocrat, in a crisis, is to reach for his wallet – or rather to reach for your wallet, since EU officials are exempt from paying national taxation. Expanding their budgets, of course, is what bureaucracies do best…….


Even so, there is something perverse about sticking to a policy which is manifestly failing in its stated objectives. Every new bailout is hailed as the end of the crisis. Everyone fails, leaving the markets as sceptical as before, but increasing the mountain of outstanding debt……


Had Greece kept the drachma, it could not have run up the monstrous debts it had accumulated by 2010: the markets would have stepped in and imposed a corrective at least three years earlier.


We now look at the ERM (Exchange Rate Mechanism) example in 1992 – for as soon as we pulled out the economy was saved from destruction despite of John Major calling it “the soft option.”


Defining the system as a tyranny Daniel Hannan continues: When preparing the document that became the European Constitution, and then the Lisbon Treaty, the EU authorities made a great show of “consulting the people.” In 2003, 200 organisations, representing ‘civil society’, were invited to submit their suggestions on what the draft should contain. Interested in how these 200 bodies had been selected, I put down a written question asking which of them received grants from the EU. After some toing and froing, the answer eventually came back: all of them.


You see how the system works? The EU sets up and funds an interest group. The group duly demands that the EU seize more powers. The EU then announces that, in response to popular demand, it is extending its jurisdiction.


What we have therefore ruling Britain is not a group of NGO’s supporting the nation’s Constitution, we have instead EU sponsored pressure groups exposed by Hannan as the European Union of Journalists, the European Women’s Lobby & the European Cyclists Federation. Independent associations not receiving EU funds are not included in the equation.


WE then can conclude how to get funding for your Charity …….


Daniel Hannan continues: One example will serve to illustrate what I’m talking about. When he introduced the Bill to ratify the Lisbon Treaty in 2007, the then Foreign Secretary, David Milliband, made a great song and dance about the fact that it wasn’t just Labour Europhiles who backed the text. A whole range of NGO’s (non-governmental organizations like charities), he told the House of Commons, had also come out in favour:’ The NSPCC has pledged its support, as have One World action, Action Aid and Oxfam,’ he said, looking pleased with himself. ‘Environmental organizations support the treaty provisions on sustainable development and even the commission of bishops supports the treaty. This is a coalition, not of ideology, but integrity.’


Integrity? A few moments on the Internet revealed that every organisation he had cited was in receipt of EU subventions. Most of them, it turned out, had also received grants from the British government. Hardly surprising, then, that they should dutifully endorse a treaty supported by their paymasters.


What was surprising was the extent of their financial dependency. When Mr. Milliband sat down, I fired off a written question asking the European Commission how much money it had paid these organisations. It turned out that, in the previous year, Action Aid, the NSPCC, One World Action and Oxfam had among them been given 43,051,542.95


Just think about that sum for a moment. Can organisations in receipt of such colossal subsidies legitimately call themselves ‘non-governmental’? Can they claim to be independent? Can they even describe themselves as charities – at least in the sense that we commonly understand the word?


Why should any of us want to give money to a body that is already forcibly expropriating us through the tax system, and then using part of the revenue to lobby the government?


In response to the findings of Daniel Hannan I issued a complaint against these charities to the Charity Commission. I am awaiting a reply.


The other body which Mr. Milliband cited, the ‘commission of bishops’, was a little harder to identify, but patient Googling revealed that its full name was the ‘Commission of Bishops’ Conferences of the European Community.’ Far from being an episcopal body that just happened to back closer union, it was a Brussels based outfit whose purpose was ‘to promote refection, based on the (Roman Catholic) Church’s social teaching, on the challenges facing a united Europe.’ In other words, while seeking to give the impression of broad support for a new transfer of powers to Brussels, the British Foreign Secretary was reduced to citing a body whose sole purpose is to interact with EU institutions, and which would be out of business if the EU disappeared.


This quoting by Milliband by “bishops” would we assume to be a reference to Protestant Bishops as mentioned in the Coronation Oath – but no these are Roman Catholic Bishops with allegiance to the EU, thus making Milliband’s statement out of line with all Britain’s Constitutional Acts particularly the Act of Settlement 1700.


The Commission then looks to control NGO’s and it is my view that NGO’s not under their control will come under severe persecution to comply, that persecution including, alienation, isolation and blockages to money supply. There is a heavy price to pay for those running truly independent NGO’s.


NGO’s like Friends of the Earth therefore work hand in hand with government bringing the conditions for even more regulation in the name of climate change, and WWF do in relation to environmental change according to Hannan.


The EU therefore have introduced to itself many dependents on its system so who is going to vote against it?


This has all brought about devastating Effects on Small Businesses and Genuine NGO’s.


Hannan has identified in his study a context, a context in which those under EU control will benefit with laws being tailored to suit controlled companies and NGO’s, companies who have developed products to suit the agreed criteria thus putting out of business those who are not in on the “club.” Likewise with NGO’s under its control, services match the EU agenda – in Britain not the heart and passion of the British Constitutional Acts and so we find the non-controlled bodies under massive pressure resulting in family break-ups, bankruptcies and those running genuine NGO’s doing miracles on a shoestring.


The EU’s strength is not to be found among the diminished ranks of true believers; not among the benign cranks who attend meetings of the European Movement or distribute leaflets for the Union of European Federalists. Nor, in truth, does it preside primarily among the officials directly on the Brussels payroll, either in the EU institutions or in its dozens of semi-detached executive bodies ( the European Human Rights Agency, the European Space Agency, the European Police College and so on).


No, the real power of the EU is to be found in the wider corpus of interested parties: the businesses which are invested in the regulatory process, the consultants and contractors dependent on Brussels spending; the landowners receiving cheques from the CAP, the local councils with their EU departments; the seconded civil servants with remuneration terms beyond anything they could hope for in their home countries; the armies of lobbyists and professional associations; as we have seen, the charities and NGO’s which, once they reach a certain size, almost always begin a financial relationship with the EU.


There are of course, persuasive lobbies within their home countries. They tend to be made up of articulate professionals. No government lightly crosses them. Nor are politicians immune to financial blandishments. It is common for former ministers to end up in EU jobs of one kind or another. Even heads of government often aim for such positions: several former prime ministers have wound up in the European Commission (Jose Manuel Barroso, for example), in the European Parliament (Jean-Luc Dehaene, Silvio Berluconi) or in the wider Eurocracy (John Bruton, the former Irish Taoseach, became the EU’s Ambassador to Washington). Members of the European Parliament (despite of lack of interest in the apparent democratic process) receive a far more attractive financial package than legislators in any of the EU’s national assemblies – even Italy.


The politicians, though, are vastly outnumbered by the corporate interests that have grown up around the EU……


Asking the question as to why Britain joined, Hannan declares that it would seem Britain joined Europe for largely economic reasons; yet for 37 out of 38 years of membership Britain has put in more than it has taken out. The exception is 1975, the year of the referendum on withdrawal and so it can be argued that European economics were deliberately manipulated to influence a vote that year.


Strange form of economics for British governments to think they could benefit financially from the EU (then EEC) by placing its farmers and fishermen under the Common Agricultural Policy and a Common Fisheries Policy that only was applied to the North Sea (for 30 years) and not the Mediterranean or Baltic making the Policy absolutely anti-British hence our losses in comparison to other European countries. Then in addition to this economic blow – free trade with the Commonwealth was replaced by the European External Tarriff with an artificial re-direction to the European continent – our great ports of Glasgow, Bristol and particularly Liverpool being on the wrong side of the country to Europe!


From 1973 onwards, GB trade has been in deficit. In the 1975 referendum pro-European politicians argued that our trade with the Commonwealth was finished and it was now Europe. How right they were, their correct analysis bring massive losses to Britain, a nation previously wealthy with its commonwealth links. For the coming years IMF data has shown growing economies in the Commonwealth and declining ones in Europe. IMF data shows stagnation in the Eurozone and an expectation of 7.2 growth in the countries of the Commonwealth, Hannan declaring:


It is difficult, pondering these figures, not to conclude that, for four decades, Britain’s economic policy has been based on a false presumption. Britain, perhaps more than any other member state, has alternative options. There is a world beyond the EU – a world whose opportunities cannot be fully exploited while Britain remains in a customs union as opposed to a free trade area.


The EU’s Common External Tariff, by which Britain is bound, is on average, be 5 or 9 per cent. For several of the member countries, this represents a historic low. But for Britain, it is a higher rate than prevailed a century ago.


There has therefore to be an alternative to EU Membership.


i)             One can be part of the single market without being full members of the EU with its political and legal integrations. The Channel Islands, Liechtenstein, Iceland and Turkey are in this category so it can be done. All these countries have unrestricted free trade and independent politically and legally. Switzerland who rejected EU membership in 1992 made various business and trading deals with the EU and we can do the same, and if we get the same deal as Switzerland this means we can get free trade deals with other countries outside the EU – a scenario that would greatly benefit our country. In this context Switzerland exported 4 times as much per head to the EU in 2010 than Britain without all the legal and political integration. Indeed Switzerland’s example has a parallel in Britain and I quote Hannan:


…. Britain’s trade with the EU, which was in surplus before we joined, has been in deficit during 37 of the 38 subsequent years. In 2010, the last year for which full figures are available, Britain ran a deficit of £52.4 billion with the EU, but a surplus of £15.7 billion with the rest of the world.


Our trade deficit is not in itself, of course, a reason to leave the EU. But it gives the lie to any notion that the other members would seek to restrict the cross-Channel commerce from which they are the chief beneficiaries. In any commercial transaction, the customer tends to have a stronger position than the salesman………

Leaving the EU with its systems contrary to the British Constitutional acts thus forcing the Monarch to either suppress or break her allegiances of her Coronation Day does not mean ending trade with Europe. Quoting Hannan again:


Withdrawal from the EU does not imply withdrawal from the European market. Indeed, under Article 50 of the Lisbon treaty, the EU is obligated to negotiate a commercial accord with any stage that leaves.


Britain might choose to remain in the European economic Area, like Norway. Norwegian exports to the EU in 2010 were twice as much per head as Britain’s. Or it might prefer to leave the EEA, and rely on bilateral free-trade accords, like Switzerland. To repeat – for this fact cannot be repeated too often – Swiss exports to the EU in 2010 were four times as much per head as Britain’s.


Some protest that, while this might be the legal position, an acrimonious split could leave the EU looking for ways to erect unofficial non-tariff barriers against British trade. Why on earth should it want to do so, though, when the balance of such trade is overwhelmingly to the advantage of Continental exporters? Over the past 40 years, Britain has run a cumulative trade surplus with every continent on the planet except Europe. Between 2005 and 2010, the EU accounted for 92 per cent of our total trade deficit. It is hard to imagine that other EU states would wish to prejudice their trade with what would be, by a long way, their single biggest export market.


ii)          Become small again: It is a fact that the most prosperous people in the world live in tiny countries. Quoting Hannan:


In the global wealth league table, the ten states with the highest GDP per capita all have populations below seven million. What matters to a modern economy is not its size, but its tax rate, its regulatory regime and its business climate. One of the reasons the EU’s GDP(Gross Domestic Product) is shrinking as a proportion of world GDP is that deeper integration means less competition among the member states, which in turn means higher taxes and more regulation.


Britain can more than survive as a small nation for in another sense the nation is large:Britain is the seventh largest economy in the world, the fourth largest military power and the fourth largest exporter. It is a member of the G8 and one of the five members of the UN Security Council. It enjoys close links to America and the Commonwealth (which, unlike the EU, is growing impressively). If seven million Swiss and four million Norwegians are able, not simply to survive outside the EU, but to enjoy arguably the highest living standards on Earth, surely sixty million Britons could manage.

Word from the Lord through David  P Griffiths, 14/10/14

“There’s Only One Jail Big Enough”


“As the present generation looks to judge the sins of past generations, it needs to be understood that this is the duty of God; & whilst, in effect, under the monarch’s crest, the monarch taking responsibility in God’s name in relation to justice, it also has to be understood the impossibility of the task.


“There is no jail big enough to take the sinners of past generations, except one, called hell-fire. And as it is not My will that any should perish, the effort going into the catching of the sinners of past generations should instead be transferred to the root cause of all these things. The effort should be on this root cause, for the present generation has not acted to remove the gross sins of politicians who brought in acts of Parliament that have killed, stolen & destroyed.


“These sins go on today; whereas commonly, 80-year-olds have stopped the sins of their youth, government continues its sin of aborting My babies; its sin of promoting immorality in schools; & its sin of stealing from the people resources that do not belong to them.


“Dealing with this on-going sin is where the effort should go, whereas dealing with the sins of past generations is My role.


“This is how I deal with sins of past generations: on those alive, I convict with My Spirit, but in Western countries there are intellectual barriers to faith, which is the result of the introduction of false philosophies into the education system, which is now over-stretched, over-stressed, built on sand, & not fit for purpose. For instead of teaching the basics of the Word of God, the system has chosen to bow down to the idols of philosophy, the idols of false science, the idols of the Green movement, rather than simply believing in the God who created the heavens & the earth.


“This is why there is so much stress about. People under stress look for escape routes. So, because of the fact that the laws which cause stress are not being removed, then there are many more sinners for the government to deal with, when in fact the biggest sinner is themselves.


“So again, I call for National Days of Repentance; as I have already stated, the build-up to the General Election is full of party manifestos that think they can do something. I am looking for a party that can do nothing; a party that will be an empty vessel for Me. For by My Spirit, I deal with the root problem of sin; & the true party, led by the Spirit of God, will remove that which has come to kill, steal & destroy.


“Oh yes! The Name which is above every other name has to be exalted in thy nation; & as that Name is exalted, so sinners of the past generations will come & repent, there then being no need to put them in prison. But those who maintain the status quo of abortion, over-regulation, & putting the nation under a foreign power, there is a jail reserved for them which will last for eternity, unless they repent before God, & bring the nation back to its Christian Constitution.”

The Real Coronation Service of 2023

bottom of page